Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AHMFX vs DHYCX
AHMFX vs DHYCX Comparison
Open Charts AHMFX vs DHYCX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-2
Price$15.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.21B
BNY Mellon High Yield Municipal Bond - C
Price$10.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.9M
AHMFX vs DHYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AHMFX vs. DHYCX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHMFX is a Hold and DHYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. DHYCX (174M). AHMFX pays higher dividends than DHYCX: AHMFX (4.20) vs DHYCX (3.09). AHMFX was incepted earlier than DHYCX: AHMFX (17 years) vs DHYCX (19 years). DHYCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than AHMFX (0.42). AHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. DHYCX (16.77). AHMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DHYCX: AHMFX (250) vs DHYCX (1000). AHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.82 vs. DHYCX (0.19). DHYCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.81 vs. AHMFX (-6.44).
| AHMFX | DHYCX | AHMFX / DHYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.85 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.85 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.131 | -0.435 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 174M | 7,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 3.09 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.82 | 0.19 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.77 | 9.26 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.44 | -4.81 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.14 | 18.94 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers