AHL
Price
$36.68
Change
-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:12 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.37B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HIPO
Price
$35.61
Change
+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:08 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
887.49M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHL vs HIPO

Header iconAHL vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts AHL vs HIPOBanner chart's image
Aspen Insurance Holdings
Price$36.68
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.37B
Hippo Holdings
Price$35.61
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization887.49M
AHL vs HIPO Comparison Chart in %
AHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHL vs. HIPO commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Hold and HIPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AHL: $36.70 vs. HIPO: $35.46)
Brand notoriety: AHL and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHL: 57% vs. HIPO: 67%
Market capitalization -- AHL: $3.37B vs. HIPO: $887.49M
AHL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $3.37B. HIPO’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $887.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $140.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AHL is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AHL and HIPO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AHL is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.55% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHL($3.37B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($887M). AHL has more cash in the bank: 6.21B vs. HIPO (454M). HIPO has less debt than AHL: HIPO (54M) vs AHL (367M). AHL has higher revenues than HIPO: AHL (3.16B) vs HIPO (425M).
AHLHIPOAHL / HIPO
Capitalization3.37B887M380%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/A32.462-
P/E Ratio6.06N/A-
Revenue3.16B425M744%
Total Cash6.21B454M1,368%
Total Debt367M54M680%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHL: Fundamental Ratings
AHL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHLHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGIIX53.08N/A
N/A
Calamos Growth & Income I
RGBLX41.07N/A
N/A
American Funds Global Balanced R1
AVEDX22.52N/A
N/A
Ave Maria Rising Dividend
QGRPX19.81N/A
N/A
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P
PFPGX29.99-0.16
-0.53%
Parnassus Growth Equity Institutional

AHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHL
1D Price
Change %
AHL100%
+0.05%
HIPO - AHL
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
CB - AHL
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
ALL - AHL
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
CNA - AHL
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
PGR - AHL
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
+3.87%
LMND - HIPO
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.29%
ROOT - HIPO
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
AIZ - HIPO
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
FNF - HIPO
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.02%
THG - HIPO
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More