AHL
Price
$36.87
Change
+$0.06 (+0.16%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.39B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNA
Price
$46.18
Change
+$0.21 (+0.46%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.5B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHL vs CNA

Header iconAHL vs CNA Comparison
Open Charts AHL vs CNABanner chart's image
Aspen Insurance Holdings
Price$36.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization3.39B
CNA Financial
Price$46.18
Change+$0.21 (+0.46%)
Volume$233.9K
Capitalization12.5B
AHL vs CNA Comparison Chart in %
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHL vs. CNA commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Hold and CNA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AHL: $36.81 vs. CNA: $45.97)
Brand notoriety: AHL and CNA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHL: 176% vs. CNA: 61%
Market capitalization -- AHL: $3.39B vs. CNA: $12.5B
AHL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $3.39B. CNA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $12.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the long-term than AHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the short-term than AHL.

Price Growth

AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

AHL is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

CNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.85% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNA($12.5B) has a higher market cap than AHL($3.39B). CNA has higher P/E ratio than AHL: CNA (12.62) vs AHL (6.08). AHL has more cash in the bank: 6.21B vs. CNA (3.71B). AHL has less debt than CNA: AHL (367M) vs CNA (2.98B). CNA has higher revenues than AHL: CNA (14.4B) vs AHL (3.16B).
AHLCNAAHL / CNA
Capitalization3.39B12.5B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/A1.968-
P/E Ratio6.0812.6248%
Revenue3.16B14.4B22%
Total Cash6.21B3.71B167%
Total Debt367M2.98B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHL vs CNA: Fundamental Ratings
AHL
CNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
7693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3821
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNA's Valuation (24) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHL (62) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's SMR Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (93) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (59) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHLCNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDSB24.110.06
+0.26%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
CTEF66.01N/A
N/A
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
FIGB43.72-0.03
-0.07%
Fidelity Investment Grade Bd ETF
GJT22.95-0.05
-0.22%
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-3 AllState Corp
BLOK64.02-0.77
-1.19%
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF

AHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHL
1D Price
Change %
AHL100%
-0.14%
HIPO - AHL
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CB - AHL
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
ALL - AHL
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
CNA - AHL
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PGR - AHL
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More

CNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNA has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNA jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNA
1D Price
Change %
CNA100%
-0.11%
L - CNA
85%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
HIG - CNA
82%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ORI - CNA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
TRV - CNA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
CINF - CNA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More