AHL
Price
$37.04
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CB
Price
$313.47
Change
+$0.15 (+0.05%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
123.37B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHL vs CB

Header iconAHL vs CB Comparison
Open Charts AHL vs CBBanner chart's image
Aspen Insurance Holdings
Price$37.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$789.39K
Capitalization3.4B
Chubb
Price$313.47
Change+$0.15 (+0.05%)
Volume$626.99K
Capitalization123.37B
AHL vs CB Comparison Chart in %
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHL vs. CB commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Buy and CB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AHL: $37.04 vs. CB: $313.47)
Brand notoriety: AHL and CB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHL: 305% vs. CB: 34%
Market capitalization -- AHL: $3.4B vs. CB: $123.37B
AHL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $3.4B. CB’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $123.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $18.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CB is a better buy in the long-term than AHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CB is a better buy in the short-term than AHL.

Price Growth

AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while CB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

AHL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

CB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.32% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CB($123B) has a higher market cap than AHL($3.4B). CB has higher P/E ratio than AHL: CB (13.10) vs AHL (5.45). CB has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. AHL (6.42B). AHL has less debt than CB: AHL (364M) vs CB (17.2B). CB has higher revenues than AHL: CB (58.9B) vs AHL (3.21B).
AHLCBAHL / CB
Capitalization3.4B123B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/A14.588-
P/E Ratio5.4513.1042%
Revenue3.21B58.9B5%
Total Cash6.42B42B15%
Total Debt364M17.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHL vs CB: Fundamental Ratings
AHL
CB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
6498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5232
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AHL's Valuation (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CB (79). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CB’s over the last 12 months.

CB's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that CB’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's SMR Rating (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CB (98). This means that AHL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CB’s over the last 12 months.

CB's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (52). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.

CB's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (58). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHLCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDTL20.980.04
+0.19%
Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Jul
ADIV18.250.02
+0.12%
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pcfc Div Bldr ETF
VONV93.22-0.04
-0.04%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
TPYP35.49-0.16
-0.45%
Tortoise North American Pipeline
DFE71.52-0.74
-1.02%
WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF

AHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHL
1D Price
Change %
AHL100%
-0.03%
HIPO - AHL
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
CB - AHL
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
ALL - AHL
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CNA - AHL
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
PGR - AHL
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

CB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CB has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CB jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CB
1D Price
Change %
CB100%
+0.05%
HIG - CB
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
TRV - CB
79%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CNA - CB
75%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
L - CB
74%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
AXS - CB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
More