It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while CB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +4.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.
CB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AHL | CB | AHL / CB | |
| Capitalization | 3.39B | 117B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | 8.282 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 6.08 | 12.38 | 49% |
| Revenue | 3.16B | 57.7B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 6.21B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 367M | 15B | 2% |
AHL | CB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHL's Valuation (62) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CB (78). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that CB’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CB (98). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (48). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
CB's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (36). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
| AHL | CB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 35% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLPOX | 8.88 | -0.02 | -0.22% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Y | |||
| PUVCX | 47.70 | -0.33 | -0.69% |
| Putnam International Small Cap C | |||
| JORRX | 20.81 | -0.19 | -0.90% |
| Janus Henderson Global Select R | |||
| LQFLX | 15.19 | -0.15 | -0.98% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3 | |||
| JNRFX | 99.87 | -2.13 | -2.09% |
| Janus Henderson Research D | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CB has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CB jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.