It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while CB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.03%.
AHL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
CB is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AHL | CB | AHL / CB | |
| Capitalization | 3.4B | 123B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | 14.588 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 5.45 | 13.10 | 42% |
| Revenue | 3.21B | 58.9B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 6.42B | 42B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 364M | 17.2B | 2% |
AHL | CB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHL's Valuation (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CB (79). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to CB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that CB’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CB (98). This means that AHL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (52). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
CB's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (58). This means that CB’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
| AHL | CB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 25% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 43% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% | 9 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 41% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDTL | 20.98 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 10 Buf ETF -Jul | |||
| ADIV | 18.25 | 0.02 | +0.12% |
| Guinness Atkinson Asia Pcfc Div Bldr ETF | |||
| VONV | 93.22 | -0.04 | -0.04% |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | |||
| TPYP | 35.49 | -0.16 | -0.45% |
| Tortoise North American Pipeline | |||
| DFE | 71.52 | -0.74 | -1.02% |
| WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CB has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CB jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.