AHL
Price
$37.37
Change
+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.43B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ALL
Price
$207.05
Change
+$5.28 (+2.62%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.8B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHL vs ALL

Header iconAHL vs ALL Comparison
Open Charts AHL vs ALLBanner chart's image
Aspen Insurance Holdings
Price$37.37
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$2.17K
Capitalization3.43B
Allstate Corp (The)
Price$207.05
Change+$5.28 (+2.62%)
Volume$10.15K
Capitalization52.8B
AHL vs ALL Comparison Chart in %
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHL vs. ALL commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHL is a Hold and ALL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AHL: $37.34 vs. ALL: $201.77)
Brand notoriety: AHL and ALL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHL: 28% vs. ALL: 73%
Market capitalization -- AHL: $3.43B vs. ALL: $52.8B
AHL [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $3.43B. ALL’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $52.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $123.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileALL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ALL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALL is a better buy in the long-term than AHL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ALL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AHL and ALL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while ALL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

AHL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

ALL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.81% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALL($52.8B) has a higher market cap than AHL($3.43B). ALL has higher P/E ratio than AHL: ALL (6.54) vs AHL (5.49). AHL YTD gains are higher at: 0.647 vs. ALL (-3.065). ALL has more cash in the bank: 9.67B vs. AHL (6.42B). AHL has less debt than ALL: AHL (364M) vs ALL (8.09B). ALL has higher revenues than AHL: ALL (66.2B) vs AHL (3.21B).
AHLALLAHL / ALL
Capitalization3.43B52.8B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.647-3.065-21%
P/E Ratio5.496.5484%
Revenue3.21B66.2B5%
Total Cash6.42B9.67B66%
Total Debt364M8.09B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHL vs ALL: Fundamental Ratings
AHL
ALL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
6493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALL's Valuation (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (60). This means that ALL’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.

ALL's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that ALL’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's SMR Rating (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (93). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as ALL (58). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to ALL’s over the last 12 months.

AHL's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALL (93). This means that AHL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHLALL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ALL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTOIX24.080.03
+0.12%
NYLI Income Builder Class I
FWATX15.98N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income A
GFBLX41.33-0.06
-0.14%
American Funds Global Balanced F3
BSGIX15.86-0.05
-0.31%
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Institutional
LGCAX20.55-0.09
-0.44%
Lord Abbett Global Equity A

AHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHL
1D Price
Change %
AHL100%
N/A
HIPO - AHL
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CB - AHL
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
ALL - AHL
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CNA - AHL
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
PGR - AHL
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More

ALL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALL has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALL jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALL
1D Price
Change %
ALL100%
+0.50%
HIG - ALL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
TRV - ALL
78%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
CNA - ALL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
L - ALL
75%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
PGR - ALL
73%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
More