It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileAIZ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AIZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while AIZ (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.27%.
AHL is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
AIZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
AHL | AIZ | AHL / AIZ | |
Capitalization | 3.37B | 11.2B | 30% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | N/A | 5.219 | - |
P/E Ratio | 6.06 | 16.08 | 38% |
Revenue | 3.16B | 12.3B | 26% |
Total Cash | 6.21B | 4.04B | 154% |
Total Debt | 367M | 2.08B | 18% |
AHL | AIZ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AIZ's Valuation (66) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (77) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AIZ (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to AIZ’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AIZ's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as AHL (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AIZ’s stock grew similarly to AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL | AIZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago45% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago51% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago56% | 2 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 6 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago54% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SPPP | 14.88 | 0.14 | +0.95% |
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | |||
HELX | 32.50 | 0.28 | +0.87% |
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF | |||
GCAL | 50.83 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
AGOX | 30.92 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | |||
GAM | 62.92 | -0.35 | -0.55% |
General American Investors Company |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIZ has been closely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AIZ jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.