AHICF
Price
$18.40
Change
-$0.45 (-2.39%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
BVS
Price
$7.19
Change
+$0.09 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
480.96M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHICF vs BVS

Header iconAHICF vs BVS Comparison
Open Charts AHICF vs BVSBanner chart's image
Asahi Intec
Price$18.40
Change-$0.45 (-2.39%)
Volume$105
Capitalization4.92B
Bioventus
Price$7.19
Change+$0.09 (+1.27%)
Volume$197.27K
Capitalization480.96M
AHICF vs BVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AHICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHICF vs. BVS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHICF is a Hold and BVS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AHICF: $18.40 vs. BVS: $7.19)
Brand notoriety: AHICF and BVS are both not notable
AHICF represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while BVS is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHICF: 3% vs. BVS: 43%
Market capitalization -- AHICF: $4.92B vs. BVS: $480.96M
AHICF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $4.92B. BVS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $480.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $167.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHICF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBVS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AHICF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BVS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AHICF is a better buy in the long-term than BVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHICF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BVS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHICF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BVS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BVS is a better buy in the short-term than AHICF.

Price Growth

AHICF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -2.39% price change this week, while BVS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BVS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.24% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.02% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHICF($4.92B) has a higher market cap than BVS($481M). BVS has higher P/E ratio than AHICF: BVS (239.67) vs AHICF (58.04). AHICF YTD gains are higher at: -5.155 vs. BVS (-31.524). AHICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. BVS (86.9M). AHICF has more cash in the bank: 41.6B vs. BVS (32.9M). BVS has less debt than AHICF: BVS (341M) vs AHICF (3.57B). AHICF has higher revenues than BVS: AHICF (115B) vs BVS (564M).
AHICFBVSAHICF / BVS
Capitalization4.92B481M1,023%
EBITDA35.9B86.9M41,312%
Gain YTD-5.155-31.52416%
P/E Ratio58.04239.6724%
Revenue115B564M20,390%
Total Cash41.6B32.9M126,444%
Total Debt3.57B341M1,048%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHICF: Fundamental Ratings
AHICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHICFBVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMAX27.780.27
+0.98%
Rex Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF
DGS57.200.54
+0.95%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmCp Div ETF
EUDG35.170.13
+0.36%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
BIBL43.330.12
+0.28%
Inspire 100 ETF
DIVG32.28-0.03
-0.09%
Invesco S&P 500 Hi Div Grwrs ETF

AHICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AHICF has been loosely correlated with AIMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AHICF jumps, then AIMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHICF
1D Price
Change %
AHICF100%
N/A
AIMD - AHICF
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
AMBFF - AHICF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDVXF - AHICF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVS - AHICF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
NMTC - AHICF
7%
Poorly correlated
+8.47%
More

BVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVS has been loosely correlated with OFIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVS jumps, then OFIX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVS
1D Price
Change %
BVS100%
+1.27%
OFIX - BVS
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
ZIMV - BVS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CSTL - BVS
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
RDNT - BVS
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
MMSI - BVS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
More