Advertisement
AHICF vs AMBFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHICF is a Hold and AMBFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHICF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAMBFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AHICF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AMBFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHICF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMBFF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHICF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- AMBFF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
AHICF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +10.08% price change this week, while AMBFF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.19% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+7.68% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AHICF | AMBFF | AHICF / AMBFF | |
| Capitalization | 4.82B | 3.79B | 127% |
| EBITDA | 35.9B | 834M | 4,305% |
| Gain YTD | -8.247 | -23.618 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 55.82 | 70.18 | 80% |
| Revenue | 115B | 5.83B | 1,971% |
| Total Cash | 41.6B | 640M | 6,500% |
| Total Debt | 3.57B | 554M | 645% |
AHICF | AMBFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMBFF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AHICF (88). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to AHICF’s over the last 12 months.
AMBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AHICF (100). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to AHICF’s over the last 12 months.
AMBFF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as AHICF (93). This means that AMBFF’s stock grew similarly to AHICF’s over the last 12 months.
AHICF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as AMBFF (62). This means that AHICF’s stock grew similarly to AMBFF’s over the last 12 months.
AHICF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMBFF (83). This means that AHICF’s stock grew significantly faster than AMBFF’s over the last 12 months.
| AHICF | AMBFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 26% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 13% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 34% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 19% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 35% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 10% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ILF | 26.12 | 0.27 | +1.04% |
| iShares Latin America 40 ETF | |||
| EMEQ | 31.27 | 0.06 | +0.20% |
| Macquarie Focused Emerging Mrkts Eq ETF | |||
| PSMJ | 30.97 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | |||
| FBUF | 28.96 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | |||
| VIXY | 37.97 | -0.17 | -0.45% |
| ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
AHICF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AHICF has been loosely correlated with AIMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AHICF jumps, then AIMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AHICF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHICF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AIMD - AHICF | 46% Loosely correlated | -9.42% | ||
| AMBFF - AHICF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TDVXF - AHICF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BVS - AHICF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| NMTC - AHICF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||
AMBFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBFF has been loosely correlated with BCCOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBFF jumps, then BCCOY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCCOY - AMBFF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AHICF - AMBFF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STSS - AMBFF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| TPGVF - AMBFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLSI - AMBFF | 22% Poorly correlated | +17.27% | ||
More | ||||