Advertisement
AHG vs LC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHG is a Hold and LC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- LC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AHG (@Medical Distributors) experienced а +2.54% price change this week, while LC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +4.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
LC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (+4.97% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| AHG | LC | AHG / LC | |
| Capitalization | 781M | 2.31B | 34% |
| EBITDA | -15.16M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.720 | 5.544 | -247% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 22.46 | - |
| Revenue | 2.22M | 950M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 47.4M | 15.9M | 298% |
| Total Debt | 350K | 19.1M | 2% |
AHG | LC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHG's Valuation (69) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LC (100). This means that AHG’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.
LC's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AHG (100). This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to AHG’s over the last 12 months.
LC's SMR Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHG (98). This means that LC’s stock grew significantly faster than AHG’s over the last 12 months.
LC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AHG (60). This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to AHG’s over the last 12 months.
AHG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for LC (87). This means that AHG’s stock grew significantly faster than LC’s over the last 12 months.
| AHG | LC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 9 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
AHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHG and FINV have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHG and FINV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHG | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| FINV - AHG | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| LPRO - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| PRG - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| RWAY - AHG | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| LC - AHG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
LC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LC has been loosely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.