AHFCF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.05M
RAND
Price
$15.22
Change
+$0.51 (+3.47%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHFCF vs RAND

Header iconAHFCF vs RAND Comparison
Open Charts AHFCF vs RANDBanner chart's image
Flow Cap
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$651
Capitalization17.05M
Rand Capital
Price$15.22
Change+$0.51 (+3.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization43.69M
AHFCF vs RAND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHFCF vs. RAND commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHFCF is a Hold and RAND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AHFCF: $0.52 vs. RAND: $15.22)
Brand notoriety: AHFCF and RAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHFCF: 100% vs. RAND: 7%
Market capitalization -- AHFCF: $17.12M vs. RAND: $43.69M
AHFCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.12M. RAND’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $43.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHFCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHFCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RAND is a better buy in the long-term than AHFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RAND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AHFCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RAND (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.08% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAND($43.7M) has a higher market cap than AHFCF($17M). AHFCF has higher P/E ratio than RAND: AHFCF (240.02) vs RAND (5.75). AHFCF YTD gains are higher at: -13.333 vs. RAND (-17.055). AHFCF has more cash in the bank: 4.7M vs. RAND (4.42M). RAND has less debt than AHFCF: RAND (600K) vs AHFCF (45.9M). AHFCF has higher revenues than RAND: AHFCF (9.36M) vs RAND (-5.79M).
AHFCFRANDAHFCF / RAND
Capitalization17M43.7M39%
EBITDA-3.84MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.333-17.05578%
P/E Ratio240.025.754,175%
Revenue9.36M-5.79M-161%
Total Cash4.7M4.42M106%
Total Debt45.9M600K7,650%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHFCF vs RAND: Fundamental Ratings
AHFCF
RAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3757
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5760
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
178
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RAND's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHFCF (92). This means that RAND’s stock grew significantly faster than AHFCF’s over the last 12 months.

AHFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RAND (60). This means that AHFCF’s stock grew similarly to RAND’s over the last 12 months.

AHFCF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as RAND (95). This means that AHFCF’s stock grew similarly to RAND’s over the last 12 months.

RAND's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as AHFCF (74). This means that RAND’s stock grew similarly to AHFCF’s over the last 12 months.

AHFCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAND (78). This means that AHFCF’s stock grew significantly faster than RAND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHFCFRAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTX163.322.81
+1.75%
RTX Corp
OMER4.450.07
+1.71%
Omeros Corp
VRNS59.540.93
+1.59%
Varonis Systems
JBI10.020.16
+1.57%
Janus International Group
CALC3.040.03
+1.00%
CalciMedica

AHFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AHFCF has been loosely correlated with MSIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AHFCF jumps, then MSIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHFCF
1D Price
Change %
AHFCF100%
N/A
MSIF - AHFCF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
RAND - AHFCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
SFES - AHFCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AHFCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWKH - AHFCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More

RAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAND and MSIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAND and MSIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAND
1D Price
Change %
RAND100%
+3.47%
MSIF - RAND
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
BCSF - RAND
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
BCIC - RAND
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
AHFCF - RAND
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMG - RAND
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More