AHFCF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.99M
MSIF
Price
$13.50
Change
-$0.15 (-1.10%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
640.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHFCF vs MSIF

Header iconAHFCF vs MSIF Comparison
Open Charts AHFCF vs MSIFBanner chart's image
Flow Cap
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$651
Capitalization16.99M
MSC Income Fund
Price$13.50
Change-$0.15 (-1.10%)
Volume$163K
Capitalization640.45M
AHFCF vs MSIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHFCF vs. MSIF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHFCF is a Hold and MSIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AHFCF: $0.52 vs. MSIF: $13.50)
Brand notoriety: AHFCF and MSIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHFCF: 100% vs. MSIF: 97%
Market capitalization -- AHFCF: $16.99M vs. MSIF: $640.45M
AHFCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.99M. MSIF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $640.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHFCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHFCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSIF is a better buy in the long-term than AHFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MSIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AHFCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSIF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSIF($640M) has a higher market cap than AHFCF($17M). AHFCF has higher P/E ratio than MSIF: AHFCF (240.02) vs MSIF (9.71). MSIF YTD gains are higher at: 17.746 vs. AHFCF (-13.333). AHFCF has less debt than MSIF: AHFCF (45.9M) vs MSIF (539M). MSIF has higher revenues than AHFCF: MSIF (63M) vs AHFCF (9.36M).
AHFCFMSIFAHFCF / MSIF
Capitalization17M640M3%
EBITDA-3.84MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.33317.746-75%
P/E Ratio240.029.712,471%
Revenue9.36M63M15%
Total Cash4.7MN/A-
Total Debt45.9M539M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHFCF: Fundamental Ratings
AHFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHFCFMSIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NIFCY13.231.13
+9.34%
Nifco Inc.
EAPIF3.09N/A
N/A
EUROAPI SA
CXMSF0.90N/A
N/A
Cemex S.A.B de C.V.
HYPRF0.95N/A
N/A
Hydrogenpro AS
RTON0.02N/A
-15.00%
Right On Brands, Inc.

AHFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AHFCF has been loosely correlated with MSIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AHFCF jumps, then MSIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHFCF
1D Price
Change %
AHFCF100%
N/A
MSIF - AHFCF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
RAND - AHFCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
SFES - AHFCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
BMNM - AHFCF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
SWKH - AHFCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

MSIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSIF has been loosely correlated with AHFCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSIF jumps, then AHFCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSIF
1D Price
Change %
MSIF100%
-1.10%
AHFCF - MSIF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PWM - MSIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+9.38%
RWAY - MSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
TPVG - MSIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
RAND - MSIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
More