AHCHF
Price
$2.91
Change
+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BZZUY
Price
$28.73
Change
+$1.53 (+5.62%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
10.41B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHCHF vs BZZUY

Header iconAHCHF vs BZZUY Comparison
Open Charts AHCHF vs BZZUYBanner chart's image
Anhui Conch Cement
Price$2.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Volume$340
Capitalization18.1B
Buzzi SpA
Price$28.73
Change+$1.53 (+5.62%)
Volume$158
Capitalization10.41B
AHCHF vs BZZUY Comparison Chart in %
AHCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BZZUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHCHF vs. BZZUY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHCHF is a Buy and BZZUY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AHCHF: $2.76 vs. BZZUY: $29.85)
Brand notoriety: AHCHF and BZZUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHCHF: 168% vs. BZZUY: 27%
Market capitalization -- AHCHF: $18.1B vs. BZZUY: $10.41B
AHCHF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $18.1B. BZZUY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $81.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBZZUY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AHCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than AHCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZZUY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BZZUY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AHCHF and BZZUY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AHCHF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BZZUY (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHCHF($18.1B) has a higher market cap than BZZUY($10.4B). AHCHF has higher P/E ratio than BZZUY: AHCHF (11.55) vs BZZUY (10.13). AHCHF YTD gains are higher at: -1.429 vs. BZZUY (-4.019). AHCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.3B vs. BZZUY (1.46B). AHCHF has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. BZZUY (1.28B). BZZUY has less debt than AHCHF: BZZUY (602M) vs AHCHF (27.4B). AHCHF has higher revenues than BZZUY: AHCHF (84.2B) vs BZZUY (4.45B).
AHCHFBZZUYAHCHF / BZZUY
Capitalization18.1B10.4B174%
EBITDA12.3B1.46B844%
Gain YTD-1.429-4.01936%
P/E Ratio11.5510.13114%
Revenue84.2B4.45B1,893%
Total Cash62.6B1.28B4,898%
Total Debt27.4B602M4,551%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHCHF vs BZZUY: Fundamental Ratings
AHCHF
BZZUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
312
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
8549
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7321
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AHCHF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14). This means that AHCHF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHCHF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHCHF (85). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (60). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHCHF (73). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHCHFBZZUY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHCHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BZZUY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAU21.360.22
+1.04%
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF
ELCV28.360.20
+0.71%
Eventide High Dividend ETF
JBND53.940.02
+0.04%
JPMorgan Active Bond ETF
QQQS35.33-0.40
-1.13%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
NVDX15.70-0.95
-5.71%
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF

AHCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHCHF and AHCHY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHCHF and AHCHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHCHF
1D Price
Change %
AHCHF100%
N/A
AHCHY - AHCHF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
CARCY - AHCHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - AHCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMY - AHCHF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZZUY - AHCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
HCMLY - BZZUY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
EXP - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.82%
CX - BZZUY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
JHX - BZZUY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
More