AHCHF
Price
$2.91
Change
+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.85B
BZZUY
Price
$27.65
Change
-$0.69 (-2.43%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.06B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHCHF vs BZZUY

Header iconAHCHF vs BZZUY Comparison
Open Charts AHCHF vs BZZUYBanner chart's image
Anhui Conch Cement
Price$2.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.69%)
Volume$340
Capitalization16.85B
Buzzi SpA
Price$27.65
Change-$0.69 (-2.43%)
Volume$255
Capitalization10.06B
AHCHF vs BZZUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AHCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHCHF vs. BZZUY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHCHF is a Hold and BZZUY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AHCHF: $2.91 vs. BZZUY: $27.65)
Brand notoriety: AHCHF and BZZUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHCHF: 1% vs. BZZUY: 26%
Market capitalization -- AHCHF: $16.85B vs. BZZUY: $10.06B
AHCHF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $16.85B. BZZUY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $10.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBZZUY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AHCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BZZUY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the long-term than AHCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHCHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZZUY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHCHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BZZUY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZZUY is a better buy in the short-term than AHCHF.

Price Growth

AHCHF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BZZUY (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZZUY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.60% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHCHF($16.8B) has a higher market cap than BZZUY($10.1B). AHCHF has higher P/E ratio than BZZUY: AHCHF (12.50) vs BZZUY (9.43). BZZUY YTD gains are higher at: 56.080 vs. AHCHF (25.431). AHCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.4B vs. BZZUY (1.46B). AHCHF has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. BZZUY (1.28B). BZZUY has less debt than AHCHF: BZZUY (602M) vs AHCHF (28.4B). AHCHF has higher revenues than BZZUY: AHCHF (86.8B) vs BZZUY (4.45B).
AHCHFBZZUYAHCHF / BZZUY
Capitalization16.8B10.1B166%
EBITDA21.4B1.46B1,468%
Gain YTD25.43156.08045%
P/E Ratio12.509.43133%
Revenue86.8B4.45B1,952%
Total Cash63.8B1.28B4,992%
Total Debt28.4B602M4,718%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHCHF vs BZZUY: Fundamental Ratings
AHCHF
BZZUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
8650
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AHCHF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BZZUY (14). This means that AHCHF’s stock grew similarly to BZZUY’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHCHF (100). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew significantly faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHCHF (86). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (54). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

BZZUY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHCHF (52). This means that BZZUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHCHFBZZUY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZZUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UFPT193.543.50
+1.84%
UFP Technologies
SRHR54.71N/A
N/A
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
ENGN6.49-0.01
-0.15%
enGene Holdings
ASMH64.37-0.13
-0.20%
ASML HOLDING NV ADRHEDGED ASMH
ZK28.82-0.30
-1.03%
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Ltd

AHCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AHCHF has been loosely correlated with AHCHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AHCHF jumps, then AHCHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHCHF
1D Price
Change %
AHCHF100%
N/A
AHCHY - AHCHF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
CBUMY - AHCHF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CARCY - AHCHF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLS - AHCHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
BZZUY - AHCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BZZUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZZUY and HDLMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZZUY and HDLMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZZUY
1D Price
Change %
BZZUY100%
N/A
HDLMY - BZZUY
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
HCMLY - BZZUY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
BZZUF - BZZUY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMA - BZZUY
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
AHCHY - BZZUY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More