AGXPF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
72.61M
87 days until earnings call
GRSLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
50.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGXPF vs GRSLF

Header iconAGXPF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts AGXPF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
SILVER X MNG
Price$0.32
Change+$0.03 (+10.34%)
Volume$927.26K
Capitalization72.61M
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$698.52K
Capitalization50.62M
AGXPF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGXPF vs. GRSLF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGXPF is a StrongBuy and GRSLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AGXPF: $0.32 vs. GRSLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: AGXPF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGXPF: 310% vs. GRSLF: 129%
Market capitalization -- AGXPF: $72.5M vs. GRSLF: $50.7M
AGXPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $72.5M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $50.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGXPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AGXPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGXPF is a better buy in the long-term than GRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGXPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGXPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AGXPF is a better buy in the short-term than GRSLF.

Price Growth

AGXPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +45.30% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +10.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGXPF is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGXPF($72.6M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($50.6M). AGXPF YTD gains are higher at: 146.510 vs. GRSLF (30.909). AGXPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79M vs. GRSLF (-9.13M). GRSLF has more cash in the bank: 1.72M vs. AGXPF (1.4M). AGXPF has higher revenues than GRSLF: AGXPF (22.3M) vs GRSLF (0).
AGXPFGRSLFAGXPF / GRSLF
Capitalization72.6M50.6M143%
EBITDA1.79M-9.13M-20%
Gain YTD146.51030.909474%
P/E RatioN/A2.84-
Revenue22.3M0-
Total Cash1.4M1.72M82%
Total Debt2.84MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGXPF vs GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
AGXPF
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2918
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
969
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGXPF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (63). This means that AGXPF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (100). This means that AGXPF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

GRSLF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGXPF (96). This means that GRSLF’s stock grew significantly faster than AGXPF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (56). This means that AGXPF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

AGXPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRSLF (100). This means that AGXPF’s stock grew similarly to GRSLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGXPFGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGXPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WRPT0.08N/A
+1.45%
WARPSPEED TAXI INC.
MBGYY15.480.04
+0.26%
Mercedes Benz Group AG
CBLUF0.30N/A
N/A
China Bluechemical Ltd.
NXDCF10.00N/A
N/A
NEXTDC Ltd, Brisbane QLD
AUGG1.21-0.01
-0.74%
Augusta Gold Corp.

AGXPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGXPF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGXPF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGXPF
1D Price
Change %
AGXPF100%
+12.07%
AAGFF - AGXPF
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
GRSLF - AGXPF
45%
Loosely correlated
+6.67%
IVPAF - AGXPF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
PRMNF - AGXPF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
ATUSF - AGXPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+6.67%
AGXPF - GRSLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+12.07%
AAGFF - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
AZMCF - GRSLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
GLNCY - GRSLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
GMBXF - GRSLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More