It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGX (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +8.05% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +27.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +200.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.19%.
AGX is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
AGX | PWR | AGX / PWR | |
Capitalization | 3B | 56.5B | 5% |
EBITDA | 112M | 2.25B | 5% |
Gain YTD | 61.140 | 20.717 | 295% |
P/E Ratio | 30.65 | 61.49 | 50% |
Revenue | 910M | 24.9B | 4% |
Total Cash | 546M | 521M | 105% |
Total Debt | 2.68M | 4.75B | 0% |
AGX | PWR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AGX's Valuation (77) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (92). This means that AGX’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (14). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to AGX’s over the last 12 months.
AGX's SMR Rating (32) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (58). This means that AGX’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (36). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to AGX’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (33). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to AGX’s over the last 12 months.
AGX | PWR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago51% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago57% | 19 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago43% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SPDW | 40.38 | 0.25 | +0.62% |
SPDR® Portfolio Developed Wld ex-US ETF | |||
HFRO | 5.23 | N/A | N/A |
Highland Opportunities and Income Fund | |||
ZSB | 13.62 | N/A | N/A |
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Stgy Fd | |||
MAV | 8.30 | -0.01 | -0.12% |
Pioneer Municipal High Income Advantage Fund | |||
AHLT | 22.07 | -0.11 | -0.49% |
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGX has been loosely correlated with STRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGX jumps, then STRL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PWR | 100% | +0.47% | ||
MTZ - PWR | 84% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
FIX - PWR | 83% Closely correlated | +3.67% | ||
PRIM - PWR | 83% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
EME - PWR | 82% Closely correlated | +3.85% | ||
STRL - PWR | 78% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More |