Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A
Price$84.38
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$60.85
Change+$0.56 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.36M
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a Buy and NWCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWCAX (901M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: AGTHX (0.35) vs NWCAX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: AGTHX (52 years) vs NWCAX (16 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.61). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. AGTHX (25.00). AGTHX (6%) and NWCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. NWCAX (5.51). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.37 vs. NWCAX (33.62).
| AGTHX | NWCAX | AGTHX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.323 | 8.875 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 901M | 36,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 5.51 | 324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.80 | 47.52 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.37 | 33.62 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.57 | 29.41 | 298% |