Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGTHX vs NWCAX
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison
Open Charts AGTHX vs NWCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer A
Price$89.47
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A
Price$63.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.28M
AGTHX vs NWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGTHX vs. NWCAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGTHX is a StrongBuy and NWCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGTHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWCAX (870M). AGTHX pays higher dividends than NWCAX: AGTHX (0.32) vs NWCAX (0.00). AGTHX was incepted earlier than NWCAX: AGTHX (52 years) vs NWCAX (17 years). NWCAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than AGTHX (0.61). NWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. AGTHX (25.00). AGTHX (6%) and NWCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. AGTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWCAX: AGTHX (250) vs NWCAX (2500). AGTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. NWCAX (-3.25). AGTHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.39 vs. NWCAX (28.80).
| AGTHX | NWCAX | AGTHX / NWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.936 | 12.829 | 148% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 870M | 38,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -3.25 | -218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.07 | 45.57 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.39 | 28.80 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.68 | 33.91 | 279% |