Advertisement
AGS vs MNA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGS is a Buy and MNA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AGS (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -0.08% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
AGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-0.20% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
AGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AGS | MNA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NWAVX | 14.57 | -0.05 | -0.34% |
| Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq R6 | |||
| LGOFX | 28.18 | -0.31 | -1.09% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F | |||
| AMEIX | 33.61 | -0.48 | -1.41% |
| American Century Equity Growth I | |||
| PAGSX | 64.05 | -0.99 | -1.52% |
| T. Rowe Price Global Stock Adv | |||
| CLTIX | 15.44 | -0.26 | -1.66% |
| Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation I | |||
AGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AGS and INSE have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGS and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| INSE - AGS | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
| PENN - AGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.28% | ||
| CZR - AGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.41% | ||
| LNW - AGS | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| HGV - AGS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.72% | ||
More | ||||
MNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNA has been loosely correlated with SPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNA jumps, then SPR could also see price increases.