AGRPY
Price
$21.30
Change
-$0.61 (-2.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.18B
MZTFF
Price
$68.25
Change
+$33.57 (+96.80%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
16.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGRPY vs MZTFF

Header iconAGRPY vs MZTFF Comparison
Open Charts AGRPY vs MZTFFBanner chart's image
Absa Group
Price$21.30
Change-$0.61 (-2.78%)
Volume$703
Capitalization9.18B
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank
Price$68.25
Change+$33.57 (+96.80%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.45B
AGRPY vs MZTFF Comparison Chart in %
AGRPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGRPY vs. MZTFF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRPY is a Hold and MZTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AGRPY: $21.30 vs. MZTFF: $68.25)
Brand notoriety: AGRPY and MZTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGRPY: 178% vs. MZTFF: 45%
Market capitalization -- AGRPY: $9.18B vs. MZTFF: $16.45B
AGRPY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.18B. MZTFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGRPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZTFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGRPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZTFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZTFF is a better buy in the long-term than AGRPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGRPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AGRPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AGRPY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.38% price change this week, while MZTFF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZTFF($16.5B) has a higher market cap than AGRPY($9.18B). MZTFF has higher P/E ratio than AGRPY: MZTFF (10.66) vs AGRPY (6.72). MZTFF YTD gains are higher at: 96.799 vs. AGRPY (11.733). AGRPY has higher revenues than MZTFF: AGRPY (113B) vs MZTFF (14.6B).
AGRPYMZTFFAGRPY / MZTFF
Capitalization9.18B16.5B56%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.73396.79912%
P/E Ratio6.7210.6663%
Revenue113B14.6B774%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A36.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGRPY vs MZTFF: Fundamental Ratings
AGRPY
MZTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1938
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
221
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGRPY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MZTFF (42). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPY (22). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to AGRPY’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MZTFF (5). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew similarly to MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPY (45). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to AGRPY’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPY (59). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to AGRPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGRPYMZTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGRPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSTL57.360.43
+0.76%
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF
EMIF25.720.18
+0.69%
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
OAKM26.310.16
+0.61%
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
BSJT21.540.04
+0.19%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 HY Corp Bd ETF
EMC31.180.02
+0.06%
Global X Emerging Mkts Great Cnsmr ETF

AGRPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGRPY has been loosely correlated with SGBLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGRPY jumps, then SGBLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGRPY
1D Price
Change %
AGRPY100%
-2.78%
SGBLY - AGRPY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
NDBKY - AGRPY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
CKHGY - AGRPY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
MZTFF - AGRPY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - AGRPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.78%
More

MZTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MZTFF has been loosely correlated with BPCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MZTFF jumps, then BPCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZTFF
1D Price
Change %
MZTFF100%
N/A
BPCGF - MZTFF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CFIC - MZTFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZNL - MZTFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGRPY - MZTFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
USMT - MZTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More