AGRPF
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 31 closing price
Capitalization
9.26B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
BCMXY
Price
$20.59
Change
-$1.53 (-6.92%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
80.76B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGRPF vs BCMXY

Header iconAGRPF vs BCMXY Comparison
Open Charts AGRPF vs BCMXYBanner chart's image
Absa Group
Price$8.11
Change-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Volume$176
Capitalization9.26B
Bank of Communications
Price$20.59
Change-$1.53 (-6.92%)
Volume$160
Capitalization80.76B
AGRPF vs BCMXY Comparison Chart in %
BCMXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGRPF vs. BCMXY commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRPF is a Hold and BCMXY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AGRPF: $8.11 vs. BCMXY: $20.59)
Brand notoriety: AGRPF and BCMXY are both not notable
AGRPF represents the Regional Banks, while BCMXY is part of the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGRPF: 100% vs. BCMXY: 101%
Market capitalization -- AGRPF: $9.26B vs. BCMXY: $80.76B
AGRPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.26B. BCMXY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $80.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.14B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $822.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCMXY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BCMXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCMXY is a better buy in the long-term than AGRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCMXY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BCMXY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AGRPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BCMXY (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCMXY is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Major Banks (-0.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCMXY($80.8B) has a higher market cap than AGRPF($9.26B). AGRPF has higher P/E ratio than BCMXY: AGRPF (6.30) vs BCMXY (4.94). BCMXY YTD gains are higher at: 13.976 vs. AGRPF (0.000). AGRPF has less debt than BCMXY: AGRPF (214B) vs BCMXY (1.2T). BCMXY has higher revenues than AGRPF: BCMXY (259B) vs AGRPF (113B).
AGRPFBCMXYAGRPF / BCMXY
Capitalization9.26B80.8B11%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00013.976-
P/E Ratio6.304.94128%
Revenue113B259B44%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt214B1.2T18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGRPF vs BCMXY: Fundamental Ratings
AGRPF
BCMXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGRPF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCMXY (92). This means that AGRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than BCMXY’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGRPF (100). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew significantly faster than AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (1). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

BCMXY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (71). This means that BCMXY’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BCMXY (48). This means that AGRPF’s stock grew similarly to BCMXY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGRPFBCMXY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCMXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVSB51.030.01
+0.02%
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
AIO23.57-0.07
-0.30%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
BKEM72.17-0.64
-0.87%
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
AVEM74.45-0.86
-1.14%
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
DARP42.19-0.83
-1.92%
Grizzle Growth ETF

AGRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGRPF and ACGBY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGRPF and ACGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGRPF
1D Price
Change %
AGRPF100%
N/A
ACGBY - AGRPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
BACHY - AGRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ABMRF - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGBF - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCMXY - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BCMXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BCMXY and EFGIF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BCMXY and EFGIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCMXY
1D Price
Change %
BCMXY100%
N/A
EFGIF - BCMXY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHF - BCMXY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - BCMXY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ACGBY - BCMXY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
AGRPF - BCMXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More