AGRPF
Price
$8.11
Change
-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 31 closing price
Capitalization
9.63B
BBVXF
Price
$15.00
Change
-$0.43 (-2.79%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.03B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGRPF vs BBVXF

Header iconAGRPF vs BBVXF Comparison
Open Charts AGRPF vs BBVXFBanner chart's image
Absa Group
Price$8.11
Change-$0.32 (-3.80%)
Volume$176
Capitalization9.63B
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A
Price$15.00
Change-$0.43 (-2.79%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization46.03B
AGRPF vs BBVXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGRPF vs. BBVXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRPF is a Buy and BBVXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AGRPF: $8.11 vs. BBVXF: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: AGRPF and BBVXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGRPF: 100% vs. BBVXF: 6%
Market capitalization -- AGRPF: $9.63B vs. BBVXF: $46.03B
AGRPF [@Major Banks] is valued at $9.63B. BBVXF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $46.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGRPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBBVXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGRPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BBVXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBVXF is a better buy in the long-term than AGRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBVXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BBVXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AGRPF (@Major Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BBVXF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBVXF($46B) has a higher market cap than AGRPF($9.63B). AGRPF has higher P/E ratio than BBVXF: AGRPF (10.77) vs BBVXF (6.25). BBVXF YTD gains are higher at: 53.571 vs. AGRPF (0.000). AGRPF has less debt than BBVXF: AGRPF (17.7B) vs BBVXF (68.2B). BBVXF has higher revenues than AGRPF: BBVXF (31.1B) vs AGRPF (8.64B).
AGRPFBBVXFAGRPF / BBVXF
Capitalization9.63B46B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00053.571-
P/E Ratio10.776.25172%
Revenue8.64B31.1B28%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17.7B68.2B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGRPF vs BBVXF: Fundamental Ratings
AGRPF
BBVXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5652
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGRPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBVXF (74). This means that AGRPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGRPF (100). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew significantly faster than AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BBVXF (2). This means that AGRPF’s stock grew similarly to BBVXF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (73). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

BBVXF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as AGRPF (56). This means that BBVXF’s stock grew similarly to AGRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGRPFBBVXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBVXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEXO.X1.2440830.027308
+2.24%
Nexo cryptocurrency
CELR.X0.0071570.000013
+0.18%
Celer Network cryptocurrency
BNX.X388.3452800.395172
+0.10%
BinaryX [Old] cryptocurrency
ANKR.X0.014125-0.000079
-0.55%
Ankr cryptocurrency
BLZ.X0.031986-0.000361
-1.12%
Bluzelle cryptocurrency

AGRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGRPF and BBVXF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGRPF and BBVXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGRPF
1D Price
Change %
AGRPF100%
N/A
BBVXF - AGRPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
ACGBY - AGRPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
ABMRF - AGRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BACHY - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ACGBF - AGRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
More

BBVXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BBVXF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBVXF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBVXF
1D Price
Change %
BBVXF100%
-2.79%
NAUBF - BBVXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
BCLYF - BBVXF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
AGRPF - BBVXF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACGBY - BBVXF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
ABMRF - BBVXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More