AGNMF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
87.36M
MLCI
Price
$7.91
Change
+$0.06 (+0.76%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
230.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGNMF vs MLCI

Header iconAGNMF vs MLCI Comparison
Open Charts AGNMF vs MLCIBanner chart's image
AGRONOMICS
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization87.36M
Mount Logan Capital
Price$7.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.76%)
Volume$32.33K
Capitalization230.83M
AGNMF vs MLCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGNMF vs. MLCI commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGNMF is a Hold and MLCI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AGNMF: $0.10 vs. MLCI: $7.91)
Brand notoriety: AGNMF and MLCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGNMF: 13% vs. MLCI: 188%
Market capitalization -- AGNMF: $87.36M vs. MLCI: $230.83M
AGNMF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $87.36M. MLCI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $230.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGNMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGNMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLCI is a better buy in the long-term than AGNMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGNMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGNMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MLCI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLCI is a better buy in the short-term than AGNMF.

Price Growth

AGNMF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.26% price change this week, while MLCI (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLCI($231M) has a higher market cap than AGNMF($87.4M). MLCI YTD gains are higher at: 367.301 vs. AGNMF (104.918).
AGNMFMLCIAGNMF / MLCI
Capitalization87.4M231M38%
EBITDA-16.21MN/A-
Gain YTD104.918367.30129%
P/E Ratio12.44N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash10.2MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLCI: Fundamental Ratings
MLCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
24

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGNMFMLCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARRRF0.37N/A
N/A
Ardea Res Ltd.
ELEZY15.52N/A
N/A
Endesa S.A.
MPGPF3.55N/A
N/A
PageGroup PLC
VOPKF45.12N/A
N/A
Koninklijke Vopak NV
BCCEF0.03N/A
N/A
BacTech Environmental Corporation

AGNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGNMF and ENFD have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGNMF and ENFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGNMF
1D Price
Change %
AGNMF100%
N/A
ENFD - AGNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OFSTF - AGNMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KROEF - AGNMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLCI - AGNMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
PAX - AGNMF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

MLCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCI has been loosely correlated with TEKCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLCI jumps, then TEKCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLCI
1D Price
Change %
MLCI100%
+0.76%
TEKCF - MLCI
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRXXF - MLCI
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBF - MLCI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGNMF - MLCI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - MLCI
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More