The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| PFFV | |
| Gain YTD | 1.634 |
| Net Assets | 300M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 |
| Turnover | 58.94 |
| Yield | 7.64 |
| Fund Existence | 5 years |
| PFFV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFV has been loosely correlated with HBANL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFFV jumps, then HBANL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFV | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| HBANL - PFFV | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| MBINM - PFFV | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FITBI - PFFV | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| VLYPO - PFFV | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| CHSCN - PFFV | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||