It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAXP’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AXP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGM (@Savings Banks) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while AXP (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.93%.
AGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.
AXP is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.
A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| AGM | AXP | AGM / AXP | |
| Capitalization | 1.78B | 251B | 1% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.164 | 24.218 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.63 | 24.49 | 39% |
| Revenue | 389M | 68.6B | 1% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.11B | - |
| Total Debt | 31B | 59.7B | 52% |
AGM | AXP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 11 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AGM's Valuation (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AXP (93) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to AXP’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AGM (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew similarly to AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's SMR Rating (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AGM (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew similarly to AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGM (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AXP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGM (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that AXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGM’s over the last 12 months.
| AGM | AXP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 58% | 30 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BCX | 10.30 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust | |||
| SJCP | 25.28 | N/A | N/A |
| SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| SSFI | 21.68 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| Day Hagan Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF | |||
| XDEC | 40.38 | -0.11 | -0.28% |
| FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mdt Bfr ETF Dec | |||
| VONG | 120.91 | -2.62 | -2.12% |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGM has been loosely correlated with NNI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGM jumps, then NNI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXP has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AXP jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AXP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AXP | 100% | -2.16% | ||
| SYF - AXP | 85% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| COF - AXP | 83% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| OMF - AXP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| ALLY - AXP | 80% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| ENVA - AXP | 75% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
More | ||||