AGFMF
Price
$9.26
Change
-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
595.31M
GLAD
Price
$25.99
Change
-$0.06 (-0.23%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
581.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGFMF vs GLAD

Header iconAGFMF vs GLAD Comparison
Open Charts AGFMF vs GLADBanner chart's image
AGF Management
Price$9.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization595.31M
Gladstone Capital
Price$25.99
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
Volume$210
Capitalization581.92M
AGFMF vs GLAD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGFMF vs. GLAD commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFMF is a StrongBuy and GLAD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AGFMF: $9.26 vs. GLAD: $26.05)
Brand notoriety: AGFMF and GLAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGFMF: 8% vs. GLAD: 92%
Market capitalization -- AGFMF: $590.58M vs. GLAD: $581.92M
AGFMF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $590.58M. GLAD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $581.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $171.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGFMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AGFMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLAD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the long-term than AGFMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGFMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGFMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AGFMF and GLAD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AGFMF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.81% price change this week, while GLAD (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGFMF($595M) and GLAD($582M) have the same market capitalization . AGFMF has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: AGFMF (8.24) vs GLAD (7.69). AGFMF YTD gains are higher at: 24.295 vs. GLAD (-3.903). AGFMF has more cash in the bank: 49.7M vs. GLAD (9.33M). AGFMF has less debt than GLAD: AGFMF (165M) vs GLAD (282M). AGFMF has higher revenues than GLAD: AGFMF (535M) vs GLAD (76.1M).
AGFMFGLADAGFMF / GLAD
Capitalization595M582M102%
EBITDA150MN/A-
Gain YTD24.295-3.903-622%
P/E Ratio8.247.69107%
Revenue535M76.1M703%
Total Cash49.7M9.33M533%
Total Debt165M282M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGFMF vs GLAD: Fundamental Ratings
AGFMF
GLAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2116
SMR RATING
1..100
7340
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAD's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (27). This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (21). This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGFMF (73). This means that GLAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (58). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (30). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGFMFGLAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIEFX15.500.18
+1.17%
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Ins
FCIKX17.220.17
+1.00%
NYLI PineStone International Eq Inv Cl
MOJCX14.70N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Momentum C
MBGFX21.55-0.07
-0.32%
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R4
DDFIX19.54-0.10
-0.51%
Invesco Diversified Dividend R5

AGFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGFMF and MAIN have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGFMF and MAIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGFMF
1D Price
Change %
AGFMF100%
-0.64%
MAIN - AGFMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
GCAAF - AGFMF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
PFX - AGFMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
GLAD - AGFMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
FSK - AGFMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with BENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then BENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
-0.61%
BENF - GLAD
87%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
MAIN - GLAD
77%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ARCC - GLAD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
CGBD - GLAD
73%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FDUS - GLAD
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
More