AGFMF
Price
$13.30
Change
+$3.35 (+33.67%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
857.47M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AJMPF
Price
$3.36
Change
+$1.00 (+42.37%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGFMF vs AJMPF

Header iconAGFMF vs AJMPF Comparison
Open Charts AGFMF vs AJMPFBanner chart's image
AGF Management
Price$13.30
Change+$3.35 (+33.67%)
Volume$450
Capitalization857.47M
Ashmore Group
Price$3.36
Change+$1.00 (+42.37%)
Volume$138.2K
Capitalization2.15B
AGFMF vs AJMPF Comparison Chart in %
AGFMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AJMPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGFMF vs. AJMPF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFMF is a Hold and AJMPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (AGFMF: $13.30 vs. AJMPF: $3.36)
Brand notoriety: AGFMF and AJMPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGFMF: 6% vs. AJMPF: 1943%
Market capitalization -- AGFMF: $857.47M vs. AJMPF: $2.15B
AGFMF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $857.47M. AJMPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGFMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAJMPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGFMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • AJMPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AJMPF is a better buy in the long-term than AGFMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGFMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AJMPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGFMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AJMPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AGFMF is a better buy in the short-term than AJMPF.

Price Growth

AGFMF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while AJMPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.41% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AJMPF($2.15B) has a higher market cap than AGFMF($857M). AJMPF has higher P/E ratio than AGFMF: AJMPF (20.91) vs AGFMF (9.52). AJMPF YTD gains are higher at: 46.261 vs. AGFMF (11.577). AGFMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159M vs. AJMPF (107M). AJMPF has more cash in the bank: 696M vs. AGFMF (64.6M). AJMPF has less debt than AGFMF: AJMPF (6M) vs AGFMF (144M). AGFMF has higher revenues than AJMPF: AGFMF (542M) vs AJMPF (174M).
AGFMFAJMPFAGFMF / AJMPF
Capitalization857M2.15B40%
EBITDA159M107M149%
Gain YTD11.57746.26125%
P/E Ratio9.5220.9146%
Revenue542M174M311%
Total Cash64.6M696M9%
Total Debt144M6M2,400%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGFMF vs AJMPF: Fundamental Ratings
AGFMF
AJMPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
7160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AJMPF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGFMF (87). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew significantly faster than AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AJMPF (100). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (71). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (39). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (24). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGFMFAJMPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGFMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AJMPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VYRDX15.190.13
+0.86%
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II R6
ALVRX10.980.08
+0.73%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val R
TRZIX18.420.06
+0.33%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Z
FLCPX27.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Large Cap Index
LMRNX33.84-0.34
-0.99%
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I

AGFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGFMF has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGFMF jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGFMF
1D Price
Change %
AGFMF100%
+0.03%
MAIN - AGFMF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
PNNT - AGFMF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
HLNE - AGFMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
JHG - AGFMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
GCAAF - AGFMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

AJMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AJMPF and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AJMPF and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AJMPF
1D Price
Change %
AJMPF100%
-3.33%
AZIHF - AJMPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - AJMPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
AABVF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - AJMPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More