AG
Price
$8.28
Change
-$0.20 (-2.36%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
24 days until earnings call
MAG
Price
$20.96
Change
-$0.21 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AG vs MAG

Header iconAG vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts AG vs MAGBanner chart's image
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
Price$8.28
Change-$0.20 (-2.36%)
Volume$16.49M
Capitalization1.79B
MAG Silver
Price$20.96
Change-$0.21 (-0.99%)
Volume$678.6K
Capitalization1.12B
AG vs MAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AG vs. MAG commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AG is a Hold and MAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (AG: $8.28 vs. MAG: $20.96)
Brand notoriety: AG: Notable vs. MAG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AG: 66% vs. MAG: 35%
Market capitalization -- AG: $1.79B vs. MAG: $1.12B
AG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.79B. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than AG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than AG.

Price Growth

AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.68% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

AG is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AG($1.79B) has a higher market cap than MAG($1.12B). AG has higher P/E ratio than MAG: AG (87.72) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 57.724 vs. AG (51.101). MAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.89M vs. AG (-77.45M). AG has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than AG: MAG (154K) vs AG (255M). AG has higher revenues than MAG: AG (587M) vs MAG (0).
AGMAGAG / MAG
Capitalization1.79B1.12B161%
EBITDA-77.45M-13.89M557%
Gain YTD51.10157.72489%
P/E Ratio87.7222.98382%
Revenue587M0-
Total Cash202M68.7M294%
Total Debt255M154K165,584%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AG vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
AG
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
9050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAG's Valuation (75) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (81). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (90). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (43). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (93). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSRX24.090.05
+0.21%
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class R6
PGOYX79.81-0.08
-0.10%
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
LMOIX41.17-0.23
-0.56%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth IS
PYSVX16.82-0.11
-0.65%
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
LOGSX20.19-0.24
-1.17%
Live Oak Health Sciences

AG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AG has been closely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AG jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AG
1D Price
Change %
AG100%
-2.36%
FSM - AG
82%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
EXK - AG
78%
Closely correlated
-3.41%
MAG - AG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
PAAS - AG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
HL - AG
75%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
More

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
-0.99%
CDE - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
N/A
AG - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
PAAS - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
HL - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
EXK - MAG
74%
Closely correlated
-3.41%
More