AG
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.24 (-3.67%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
40 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$6.80
Change
-$0.38 (-5.29%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AG vs HL

Header iconAG vs HL Comparison
Open Charts AG vs HLBanner chart's image
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
Price$6.30
Change-$0.24 (-3.67%)
Volume$8.33M
CapitalizationN/A
Hecla Mining
Price$6.80
Change-$0.38 (-5.29%)
Volume$13.99M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AG vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AG vs. HL commentary
Sep 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AG is a Hold and HL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2024
Stock price -- (AG: $5.28 vs. HL: $5.39)
Brand notoriety: AG and HL are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AG: 133% vs. HL: 138%
Market capitalization -- AG: $1.79B vs. HL: $3.01B
AG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.79B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $977.73M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than AG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AG is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

AG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.81% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8976.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

AG is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

HL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than AG($1.79B). HL has higher P/E ratio than AG: HL (1111.11) vs AG (87.72). HL YTD gains are higher at: 12.599 vs. AG (-13.955). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. AG (-77.45M). AG has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. HL (106M). AG has less debt than HL: AG (255M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than AG: HL (720M) vs AG (587M).
AGHLAG / HL
Capitalization1.79B3.01B60%
EBITDA-77.45M124M-62%
Gain YTD-13.95512.599-111%
P/E Ratio87.721111.118%
Revenue587M720M82%
Total Cash202M106M191%
Total Debt255M663M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AG vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
AG
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
921
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AG's Valuation (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (98). This means that AG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AG (100). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (91) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (94). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AG (63). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to AG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AG (92). This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than AG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

AG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AG
1D Price
Change %
AG100%
-5.55%
PAAS - AG
79%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
MAG - AG
78%
Closely correlated
-6.67%
EXK - AG
76%
Closely correlated
-8.17%
HL - AG
75%
Closely correlated
-9.11%
CDE - AG
73%
Closely correlated
-11.07%
More

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-9.11%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
-11.07%
PAAS - HL
82%
Closely correlated
-5.24%
MAG - HL
79%
Closely correlated
-6.67%
AG - HL
76%
Closely correlated
-5.55%
SAND - HL
76%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
More