Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$25.54
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. AFYCX (1.86B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.48) vs AFYCX (0.94). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. AFYCX (4.75). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.79 vs. AFYCX (50.79).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.878 | 5.739 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.48 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 7.88 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 32.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.79 | 56.79 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.62 | 71.15 | 157% |