Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. AFYCX (1.86B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs AFYCX (0.91). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. AFYCX (4.30). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. AFYCX (45.59).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.371 | 8.213 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 205B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.43 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.30 | 7.95 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.61 | 34.82 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.59 | 50.81 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.17 | 83.34 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement