Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$24.69
Change-$2.20 (-8.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. AFYCX (1.74B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.45) vs AFYCX (0.80). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFYCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. AFYCX (0.44). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. AFYCX (24.34).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.31 | 526% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.31 | 526% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.696 | 1.520 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.45 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | 5.51 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.29 | 30.53 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.34 | 37.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.57 | 98.02 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement