Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.72
Change-$0.25 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. AFYCX (1.83B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs AFYCX (0.89). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. AFYCX (2.46). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. AFYCX (41.53).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.995 | 11.486 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.46 | 5.30 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.27 | 32.83 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.53 | 47.43 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.52 | 82.53 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement