Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$24.98
Change-$0.20 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.95
Change-$0.64 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.45B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. AFYCX (1.85B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.47) vs AFYCX (0.96). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. AFYCX (2.18). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.87 vs. AFYCX (48.88).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.410 | 1.465 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 196B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 4.65 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.10 | 24.78 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.88 | 51.87 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.71 | 61.07 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement