Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMEX
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMEX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$27.00
Change+$0.15 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$67.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. AFYCX (1.82B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMEX (1.13) vs AFYCX (0.86). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMEX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.37 vs. AFYCX (1.76). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.78 vs. AFYCX (39.83).
| AFYCX | RWMEX | AFYCX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.60 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.60 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.913 | 11.507 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 212B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.76 | 4.37 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.15 | 28.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.83 | 42.78 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.37 | 74.63 | 169% |