Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMEX
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMEX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$23.99
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$65.34
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMEX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. AFYCX (1.72B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMEX (1.13) vs AFYCX (0.86). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). AFYCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMEX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. AFYCX (-2.58). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.45 vs. AFYCX (24.10).
| AFYCX | RWMEX | AFYCX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.60 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.60 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.269 | 7.971 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.58 | 6.13 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 31.78 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.10 | 40.45 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.44 | 79.66 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement