Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWEBX
AFYCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWEBX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.72
Change+$0.30 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
AFYCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. AFYCX (1.86B). AFYCX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: AFYCX (0.91) vs RWEBX (0.78). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWEBX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. AFYCX (4.30). RWEBX (46.70) and AFYCX (45.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFYCX | RWEBX | AFYCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.06 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.06 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.371 | 7.651 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 205B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.78 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.30 | 7.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.61 | 32.20 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.59 | 46.70 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.17 | 77.32 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement