Advertisement
AFYA vs TRI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYA is a Hold and TRI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AFYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFYA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFYA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AFYA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while TRI (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFYA is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| AFYA | TRI | AFYA / TRI | |
| Capitalization | 1.67B | 70.4B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 1.06B | 2.95B | 36% |
| Gain YTD | 11.571 | 26.217 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.72 | 27.29 | 87% |
| Revenue | 2.73B | 6.79B | 40% |
| Total Cash | 822M | 1.26B | 65% |
| Total Debt | 2.83B | 3.54B | 80% |
AFYA | TRI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AFYA's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as TRI (97) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that AFYA’s stock grew similarly to TRI’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFYA (100) in the null industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew significantly faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's SMR Rating (48) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as AFYA (52) in the null industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as AFYA (55) in the null industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew similarly to AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
TRI's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFYA (88) in the null industry. This means that TRI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
| AFYA | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 32% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 28% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDIV | 15.54 | 0.14 | +0.91% |
| Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF | |||
| OUSA | 54.76 | 0.30 | +0.56% |
| ALPS O'Shares US Quality Div ETF | |||
| RNWZ | 24.58 | N/A | N/A |
| TrueShares Eagle Glbl Rnwbls Engy IncETF | |||
| TLT | 86.97 | -0.61 | -0.70% |
| iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| DXD | 23.48 | -0.31 | -1.30% |
| ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | |||
AFYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFYA has been loosely correlated with ADT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFYA jumps, then ADT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYA | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| ADT - AFYA | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| RELX - AFYA | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ARMK - AFYA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| DLB - AFYA | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| TRI - AFYA | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
TRI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRI has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRI jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| RELX - TRI | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| VRSK - TRI | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CTAS - TRI | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| RBA - TRI | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MSA - TRI | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
More | ||||