AFXXF
Price
$18.32
Change
-$0.57 (-3.02%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.95B
WLGS
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFXXF vs WLGS

Header iconAFXXF vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts AFXXF vs WLGSBanner chart's image
AFRY AB
Price$18.32
Change-$0.57 (-3.02%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.95B
Wang & Lee Group
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$534.85K
Capitalization4.59M
AFXXF vs WLGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFXXF vs. WLGS commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFXXF is a Hold and WLGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (AFXXF: $18.33 vs. WLGS: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: AFXXF and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFXXF: 100% vs. WLGS: 10%
Market capitalization -- AFXXF: $1.95B vs. WLGS: $4.59M
AFXXF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $1.95B. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $4.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $6.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFXXF is a better buy in the long-term than WLGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLGS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WLGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AFXXF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.19% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFXXF($1.95B) has a higher market cap than WLGS($4.59M). AFXXF has higher P/E ratio than WLGS: AFXXF (17.97) vs WLGS (12.80). AFXXF YTD gains are higher at: -3.042 vs. WLGS (-87.365).
AFXXFWLGSAFXXF / WLGS
Capitalization1.95B4.59M42,424%
EBITDA2.72BN/A-
Gain YTD-3.042-87.3653%
P/E Ratio17.9712.80140%
Revenue27BN/A-
Total Cash884MN/A-
Total Debt6.97BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
WLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

AFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFXXF and MCDIF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFXXF and MCDIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFXXF
1D Price
Change %
AFXXF100%
N/A
MCDIF - AFXXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EKIVY - AFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTNGY - AFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLGS - AFXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-8.83%
OPMXF - AFXXF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and BBCP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and BBCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
-8.83%
BBCP - WLGS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
NVEE - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
MTZ - WLGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
AGX - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
BLD - WLGS
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
More