Advertisement
AFSM vs TRMK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFSM is a Hold and TRMK is a Hold.
TRMK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AFSM | TRMK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTTUX | 54.52 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R6 | |||
| MWEIX | 49.02 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| MFS Global Equity I | |||
| MIGBX | 33.34 | -0.07 | -0.21% |
| MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B | |||
| MMYAX | 8.43 | -0.02 | -0.24% |
| MassMutual Small Company Value A | |||
| WISGX | 21.20 | -0.22 | -1.03% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap GrInstl | |||
AFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFSM has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFSM jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSM | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| PIPR - AFSM | 85% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| JXN - AFSM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TRMK - AFSM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FHB - AFSM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| REZI - AFSM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||
TRMK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRMK has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRMK jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRMK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRMK | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| UBSI - TRMK | 92% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ABCB - TRMK | 92% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| HWC - TRMK | 91% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SBCF - TRMK | 91% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| UCB - TRMK | 91% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
More | ||||