Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFSM vs SCHA
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts AFSM vs SCHA
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Price$31.67
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$343
Net Assets45.18M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$27.77
Change-$0.11 (-0.39%)
Volume$17.19K
Net Assets18.81B
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFSM vs. SCHA commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFSM is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.8B vs. AFSM (45.2M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than AFSM: SCHA (8.757) vs AFSM (6.082). AFSM was incepted earlier than SCHA: AFSM (6 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than AFSM (0.75). AFSM has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| AFSM | SCHA | AFSM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 6.082 | 8.757 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 18.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.04 | 1,875% |
| Turnover | 79.00 | 11.00 | 718% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 1.42 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFSM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFSM has been closely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFSM jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSM | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| CSW - AFSM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PIPR - AFSM | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.11% | ||
| CADE - AFSM | 54% Loosely correlated | -8.15% | ||
| ACT - AFSM | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| ALRM - AFSM | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||