Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFSM vs SCHA
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts AFSM vs SCHA
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Price$34.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$19.31K
Net Assets73.62M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$30.29
Change+$0.16 (+0.53%)
Volume$2.59M
Net Assets20.44B
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFSM vs. SCHA commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFSM is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 20.4B vs. AFSM (73.6M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than AFSM: SCHA (6.355) vs AFSM (4.069). AFSM was incepted earlier than SCHA: AFSM (6 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than AFSM (0.75). AFSM has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| AFSM | SCHA | AFSM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.069 | 6.355 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 73.6M | 20.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.04 | 1,875% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 11.00 | 591% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 1.26 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFSM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 77% | 16 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
AFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFSM has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFSM jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSM | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| PIPR - AFSM | 83% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CSW - AFSM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| JXN - AFSM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| PHIN - AFSM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CBL - AFSM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||