AFRM
Price
$69.19
Change
+$0.82 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
46 days until earnings call
WALD
Price
$2.82
Change
+$0.10 (+3.68%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
794.11M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs WALD

Header iconAFRM vs WALD Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs WALDBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$69.19
Change+$0.82 (+1.20%)
Volume$2.3M
Capitalization11.43B
Waldencast
Price$2.82
Change+$0.10 (+3.68%)
Volume$30.91K
Capitalization794.11M
AFRM vs WALD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WALD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. WALD commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and WALD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $69.19)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WALD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WALD is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.42% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than WALD($794M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 13.612 vs. WALD (-29.851). WALD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.21M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. WALD (99.7K). WALD has less debt than AFRM: WALD (2.1M) vs AFRM (6.24B). AFRM has higher revenues than WALD: AFRM (1.91B) vs WALD (0).
AFRMWALDAFRM / WALD
Capitalization11.4B794M1,436%
EBITDA-322M-17.21M1,870%
Gain YTD13.612-29.851-46%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.91B0-
Total Cash1.95B99.7K1,956,871%
Total Debt6.24B2.1M297,286%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMWALD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WALD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFTX24.200.27
+1.13%
Buffalo Mid Cap Discovery
GRISX29.450.25
+0.86%
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Instl Svc
GGMMX11.340.09
+0.80%
Gabelli Global Mini Mites I
ERSGX14.410.10
+0.70%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R
AEIMX8.810.03
+0.34%
American Century Equity Income G

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+1.20%
NET - AFRM
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
XYZ - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
HUBS - AFRM
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
DOCN - AFRM
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
More

WALD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WALD
1D Price
Change %
WALD100%
+3.68%
SOS - WALD
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
GBTG - WALD
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
AFRM - WALD
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
RXT - WALD
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
BTDR - WALD
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.28%
More