AFRM
Price
$63.32
Change
-$7.57 (-10.68%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
NN
Price
$16.46
Change
-$1.09 (-6.21%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
91 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AFRM vs NN

Header iconAFRM vs NN Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs NNBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$63.32
Change-$7.57 (-10.68%)
Volume$116.36K
CapitalizationN/A
NextNav
Price$16.46
Change-$1.09 (-6.21%)
Volume$21.58K
CapitalizationN/A
AFRM vs NN Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. NN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and NN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AFRM: $70.89 vs. NN: $17.55)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and NN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 99% vs. NN: 97%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. NN: $731.63M
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. NN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $731.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than NN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFRM and NN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.89% price change this week, while NN (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

NN is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than NN($732M). NN YTD gains are higher at: 294.382 vs. AFRM (44.261). NN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.71M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. NN (85.8M). NN has less debt than AFRM: NN (66.1M) vs AFRM (6.24B). AFRM has higher revenues than NN: AFRM (1.91B) vs NN (3.86M).
AFRMNNAFRM / NN
Capitalization11.4B732M1,557%
EBITDA-322M-58.71M548%
Gain YTD44.261294.38215%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.91B3.86M49,560%
Total Cash1.95B85.8M2,274%
Total Debt6.24B66.1M9,445%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-2.70%
SQ - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
BILL - AFRM
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
PGY - AFRM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
EVCM - AFRM
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
SSNC - AFRM
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More

NN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NN has been loosely correlated with DNACF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NN jumps, then DNACF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NN
1D Price
Change %
NN100%
-2.50%
DNACF - NN
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EVCM - NN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
S - NN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
YOU - NN
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
AFRM - NN
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
More