AFRM
Price
$57.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
19 days until earnings call
NN
Price
$12.99
Change
+$0.20 (+1.56%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
731.63M
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AFRM vs NN

Header iconAFRM vs NN Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs NNBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$57.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$4.26M
Capitalization11.43B
NextNav
Price$12.99
Change+$0.20 (+1.56%)
Volume$972.92K
Capitalization731.63M
AFRM vs NN Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. NN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and NN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $57.99 vs. NN: $12.99)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and NN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 56% vs. NN: 64%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. NN: $731.63M
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. NN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $731.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than NN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NN is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.85% price change this week, while NN (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

NN is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than NN($732M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: -4.778 vs. NN (-16.517). NN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.71M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. NN (85.8M). NN has less debt than AFRM: NN (66.1M) vs AFRM (6.24B). AFRM has higher revenues than NN: AFRM (1.91B) vs NN (3.86M).
AFRMNNAFRM / NN
Capitalization11.4B732M1,557%
EBITDA-322M-58.71M548%
Gain YTD-4.778-16.51729%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.91B3.86M49,560%
Total Cash1.95B85.8M2,274%
Total Debt6.24B66.1M9,445%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-0.02%
SQ - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
PGY - AFRM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
EVCM - AFRM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
BILL - AFRM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
BTDR - AFRM
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
More

NN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NN has been loosely correlated with DNACF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NN jumps, then DNACF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NN
1D Price
Change %
NN100%
+1.56%
DNACF - NN
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EVCM - NN
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
AFRM - NN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
SQ - NN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
YOU - NN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More