AFRM
Price
$82.73
Change
-$7.39 (-8.20%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
26.94B
42 days until earnings call
NET
Price
$223.26
Change
-$5.02 (-2.20%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
77.8B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs NET

Header iconAFRM vs NET Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs NETBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$82.73
Change-$7.39 (-8.20%)
Volume$7.73M
Capitalization26.94B
Cloudflare
Price$223.26
Change-$5.02 (-2.20%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization77.8B
AFRM vs NET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. NET commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and NET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $82.73 vs. NET: $223.26)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and NET are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 101% vs. NET: 78%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $26.94B vs. NET: $77.8B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $26.94B. NET’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $77.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNET’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NET’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NET is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NET is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -8.04% price change this week, while NET (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

NET is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.99% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NET($77.8B) has a higher market cap than AFRM($26.9B). NET YTD gains are higher at: 107.337 vs. AFRM (35.846). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. NET (53.8M). NET has more cash in the bank: 3.96B vs. AFRM (2.23B). NET has less debt than AFRM: NET (3.46B) vs AFRM (7.85B). AFRM has higher revenues than NET: AFRM (3.22B) vs NET (1.88B).
AFRMNETAFRM / NET
Capitalization26.9B77.8B35%
EBITDA712M53.8M1,323%
Gain YTD35.846107.33733%
P/E Ratio551.53N/A-
Revenue3.22B1.88B171%
Total Cash2.23B3.96B56%
Total Debt7.85B3.46B227%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NET: Fundamental Ratings
NET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMNET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGGS41.650.06
+0.13%
Harbor Disciplined Bond ETF
CEF35.420.03
+0.08%
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust
SIXP30.66-0.13
-0.42%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Mar/Sep ETF
IGPT54.59-0.42
-0.76%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
JHS11.61-0.09
-0.77%
John Hancock Income Securities Trust Capital Stock

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-8.20%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
NET - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
XYZ - AFRM
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.11%
More

NET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NET has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NET jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NET
1D Price
Change %
NET100%
-2.20%
ZS - NET
67%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
CRWD - NET
66%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
SNOW - NET
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.61%
MDB - NET
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
HUBS - NET
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
More