AFRM
Price
$76.02
Change
-$1.92 (-2.46%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.38B
40 days until earnings call
MSTR
Price
$309.20
Change
+$8.50 (+2.83%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.33B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs MSTR

Header iconAFRM vs MSTR Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs MSTRBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$76.02
Change-$1.92 (-2.46%)
Volume$64.25K
Capitalization25.38B
Strategy
Price$309.20
Change+$8.50 (+2.83%)
Volume$139.21K
Capitalization85.33B
AFRM vs MSTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. MSTR commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and MSTR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $76.02 vs. MSTR: $309.20)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and MSTR are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while MSTR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 34% vs. MSTR: 37%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $25.38B vs. MSTR: $85.33B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $25.38B. MSTR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $85.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSTR is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSTR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSTR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSTR is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -17.53% price change this week, while MSTR (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.55%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MSTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.19% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSTR($85.3B) has a higher market cap than AFRM($25.4B). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than MSTR: AFRM (519.60) vs MSTR (21.09). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 27.980 vs. MSTR (6.761). MSTR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. AFRM (712M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. MSTR (50.1M). AFRM (7.85B) and MSTR (8.21B) have identical debt. AFRM has higher revenues than MSTR: AFRM (3.22B) vs MSTR (462M).
AFRMMSTRAFRM / MSTR
Capitalization25.4B85.3B30%
EBITDA712M6.65B11%
Gain YTD27.9806.761414%
P/E Ratio519.6021.092,464%
Revenue3.22B462M698%
Total Cash2.23B50.1M4,443%
Total Debt7.85B8.21B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSTR: Fundamental Ratings
MSTR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMMSTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBIB99.61N/A
N/A
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S.TrsBd3-10YrETF
DFSB53.14-0.05
-0.08%
Dimensional Global Sstby Fxd Inc ETF
AIQ48.92-0.32
-0.65%
Global X Artfcl Intlgc & Tech ETF
KCCA17.07-0.12
-0.70%
KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF
JXX27.95-0.43
-1.51%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-4.40%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
NET - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
XYZ - AFRM
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
More

MSTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSTR has been loosely correlated with BTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSTR jumps, then BTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSTR
1D Price
Change %
MSTR100%
+2.83%
BTDR - MSTR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
AFRM - MSTR
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
BKKT - MSTR
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.84%
EVCM - MSTR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
BLZE - MSTR
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
More