AFRM
Price
$87.35
Change
-$2.31 (-2.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
28.45B
60 days until earnings call
LFMD
Price
$6.06
Change
-$0.22 (-3.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
287.35M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs LFMD

Header iconAFRM vs LFMD Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs LFMDBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$87.35
Change-$2.31 (-2.58%)
Volume$9.28M
Capitalization28.45B
LifeMD
Price$6.06
Change-$0.22 (-3.50%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization287.35M
AFRM vs LFMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. LFMD commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and LFMD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $87.35 vs. LFMD: $6.06)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and LFMD are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while LFMD is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 130% vs. LFMD: 74%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $28.45B vs. LFMD: $287.35M
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $28.45B. LFMD’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $287.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFMD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LFMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than LFMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LFMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFMD is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while LFMD (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

LFMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($28.4B) has a higher market cap than LFMD($287M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 43.432 vs. LFMD (22.424). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 587M vs. LFMD (8.55M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. LFMD (36.2M). LFMD has less debt than AFRM: LFMD (22.1M) vs AFRM (7.36B). AFRM has higher revenues than LFMD: AFRM (3.01B) vs LFMD (246M).
AFRMLFMDAFRM / LFMD
Capitalization28.4B287M9,895%
EBITDA587M8.55M6,863%
Gain YTD43.43222.424194%
P/E Ratio582.33N/A-
Revenue3.01B246M1,222%
Total Cash2.13B36.2M5,887%
Total Debt7.36B22.1M33,294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFMD: Fundamental Ratings
LFMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMLFMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGGOF1.310.05
+3.97%
GOLCONDA GOLD LTD.
HAYPY8.07N/A
N/A
Hays PLC
SEOJF8.56N/A
N/A
Stora Enso Oyj
NBNKF15.10N/A
N/A
Nordea Bank Abp
FRFLF0.25N/A
N/A
FRNT Financial Inc.

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-2.58%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
NET - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
XYZ - AFRM
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
More

LFMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFMD has been loosely correlated with XYZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFMD jumps, then XYZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFMD
1D Price
Change %
LFMD100%
-3.50%
XYZ - LFMD
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
DBX - LFMD
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
AFRM - LFMD
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
ONTF - LFMD
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
SDGR - LFMD
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
More