It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.83% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.
AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
AFRM | IPAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 5 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago87% | 3 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago88% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NGREX | 10.11 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
Northern Global Real Estate Index | |||
STCAX | 17.33 | -0.04 | -0.23% |
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk I | |||
TRZVX | 53.88 | -0.22 | -0.41% |
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Z | |||
PLLAX | 27.35 | -0.12 | -0.44% |
Principal SmallCap A | |||
GCSVX | 9.75 | -0.06 | -0.61% |
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Institutional |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AFRM | 100% | +2.21% | ||
SHOP - AFRM | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
NET - AFRM | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
HUBS - AFRM | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
XYZ - AFRM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
CRWD - AFRM | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPAY has been closely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPAY jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY | 100% | -0.22% | ||
CPAY - IPAY | 81% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
PYPL - IPAY | 73% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
MA - IPAY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
EEFT - IPAY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
AFRM - IPAY | 72% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More |