AFRM
Price
$87.35
Change
-$2.31 (-2.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
28.45B
59 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$487.53
Change
+$23.22 (+5.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.69B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs HUBS

Header iconAFRM vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$87.35
Change-$2.31 (-2.58%)
Volume$9.28M
Capitalization28.45B
HUBSPOT
Price$487.53
Change+$23.22 (+5.00%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization25.69B
AFRM vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $87.35 vs. HUBS: $487.53)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and HUBS are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while HUBS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 130% vs. HUBS: 123%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $28.45B vs. HUBS: $25.69B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $28.45B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $309.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($28.4B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($25.7B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than AFRM: HUBS (7023.44) vs AFRM (582.33). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 43.432 vs. HUBS (-30.030). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 587M vs. HUBS (126M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than AFRM: HUBS (281M) vs AFRM (7.36B). AFRM has higher revenues than HUBS: AFRM (3.01B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
AFRMHUBSAFRM / HUBS
Capitalization28.4B25.7B111%
EBITDA587M126M466%
Gain YTD43.432-30.030-145%
P/E Ratio582.337023.448%
Revenue3.01B2.85B106%
Total Cash2.13B1.67B128%
Total Debt7.36B281M2,619%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PML7.390.15
+2.07%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
WEA11.100.07
+0.63%
Western Asset Premier
SJNK25.500.02
+0.08%
SPDR® Blmbg ST HY Bd ETF
NBTR50.36N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
RINF32.68-0.16
-0.49%
ProShares Inflation Expectations

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-2.58%
NET - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
XYZ - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+5.00%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
TEAM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
More