AFRM
Price
$76.03
Change
-$1.91 (-2.45%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.76B
39 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$517.76
Change
+$11.08 (+2.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
27.28B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs HUBS

Header iconAFRM vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$76.03
Change-$1.91 (-2.45%)
Volume$6.14M
Capitalization24.76B
HUBSPOT
Price$517.76
Change+$11.08 (+2.19%)
Volume$461.36K
Capitalization27.28B
AFRM vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $76.03 vs. HUBS: $517.76)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and HUBS are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while HUBS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 80% vs. HUBS: 53%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $24.76B vs. HUBS: $27.28B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $24.76B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $27.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.8T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $308B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -17.52% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($27.3B) has a higher market cap than AFRM($24.8B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than AFRM: HUBS (7023.44) vs AFRM (506.87). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 24.844 vs. HUBS (-25.691). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. HUBS (126M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than AFRM: HUBS (281M) vs AFRM (7.85B). AFRM has higher revenues than HUBS: AFRM (3.22B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
AFRMHUBSAFRM / HUBS
Capitalization24.8B27.3B91%
EBITDA712M126M565%
Gain YTD24.844-25.691-97%
P/E Ratio506.877023.447%
Revenue3.22B2.85B113%
Total Cash2.23B1.67B133%
Total Debt7.85B281M2,795%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FETH40.231.19
+3.05%
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
HCMT36.990.33
+0.90%
Direxion HCM Tactical EnhU.S.EqStratETF
SPYI52.100.22
+0.42%
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
MAMB23.570.02
+0.10%
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
LITP9.08-0.07
-0.71%
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-2.45%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
NET - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
XYZ - AFRM
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.01%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.86%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+2.19%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More