AFRM
Price
$62.16
Change
+$0.50 (+0.81%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.52B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOOD
Price
$80.62
Change
-$6.45 (-7.41%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
72.49B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs HOOD

Header iconAFRM vs HOOD Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs HOODBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$62.16
Change+$0.50 (+0.81%)
Volume$8.23M
Capitalization20.52B
Robinhood Markets
Price$80.62
Change-$6.45 (-7.41%)
Volume$62.55M
Capitalization72.49B
AFRM vs HOOD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. HOOD commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and HOOD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $62.16 vs. HOOD: $80.62)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and HOOD are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while HOOD is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 157% vs. HOOD: 258%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $20.52B vs. HOOD: $72.49B
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $20.52B. HOOD’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $72.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $634.57B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOOD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOOD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOOD is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOOD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOOD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFRM and HOOD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -4.90% price change this week, while HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -22.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

HOOD is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.67% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.66% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOOD($72.5B) has a higher market cap than AFRM($20.5B). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than HOOD: AFRM (90.09) vs HOOD (33.59). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: -16.485 vs. HOOD (-28.718). HOOD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. AFRM (918M). HOOD has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. AFRM (2.24B). AFRM has less debt than HOOD: AFRM (7.96B) vs HOOD (15.7B). HOOD has higher revenues than AFRM: HOOD (4.2B) vs AFRM (3.46B).
AFRMHOODAFRM / HOOD
Capitalization20.5B72.5B28%
EBITDA918M2.09B44%
Gain YTD-16.485-28.71857%
P/E Ratio90.0933.59268%
Revenue3.46B4.2B82%
Total Cash2.24B14.6B15%
Total Debt7.96B15.7B51%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMHOOD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOOD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCF34.87N/A
N/A
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
TBFG30.84-0.06
-0.19%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
APUE42.14-0.19
-0.45%
ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
WCBR24.84-0.17
-0.69%
WisdomTree Cybersecurity ETF
UXJL33.07-0.31
-0.94%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
+0.81%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
-6.14%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
-10.04%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
-7.82%
SOFI - AFRM
68%
Closely correlated
-4.64%
OMF - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More

HOOD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOOD has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOOD jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOOD
1D Price
Change %
HOOD100%
-7.41%
COIN - HOOD
76%
Closely correlated
-6.14%
GS - HOOD
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
RIOT - HOOD
62%
Loosely correlated
-7.82%
CANG - HOOD
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
MS - HOOD
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
More