AFRM
Price
$73.01
Change
+$0.68 (+0.94%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.33B
17 days until earnings call
GRND
Price
$17.01
Change
+$1.32 (+8.41%)
Updated
Aug 11, 03:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
98 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs GRND

Header iconAFRM vs GRND Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs GRNDBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$73.01
Change+$0.68 (+0.94%)
Volume$52.7K
Capitalization23.33B
Grindr
Price$17.01
Change+$1.32 (+8.41%)
Volume$1.95K
Capitalization3.01B
AFRM vs GRND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. GRND commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and GRND is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $72.33 vs. GRND: $15.69)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and GRND are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while GRND is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 166% vs. GRND: 355%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $23.33B vs. GRND: $3.01B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $23.33B. GRND’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRND is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRND is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.91% price change this week, while GRND (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

GRND is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($23.3B) has a higher market cap than GRND($3.01B). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 18.768 vs. GRND (-12.052). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 587M vs. GRND (-41.42M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. GRND (256M). GRND has less debt than AFRM: GRND (290M) vs AFRM (7.36B). AFRM has higher revenues than GRND: AFRM (3.01B) vs GRND (363M).
AFRMGRNDAFRM / GRND
Capitalization23.3B3.01B774%
EBITDA587M-41.42M-1,417%
Gain YTD18.768-12.052-156%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.01B363M828%
Total Cash2.13B256M832%
Total Debt7.36B290M2,537%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMGRND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MJ24.321.14
+4.92%
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF
SCHK30.730.21
+0.69%
Schwab 1000 ETF
RNRG10.010.03
+0.35%
Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
PWRD94.080.02
+0.02%
TCW Transform Systems ETF
IGPT50.17-0.08
-0.15%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-8.40%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
NET - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
XYZ - AFRM
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.50%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.51%
More

GRND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRND has been loosely correlated with ACON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRND jumps, then ACON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRND
1D Price
Change %
GRND100%
-12.30%
ACON - GRND
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
MDB - GRND
39%
Loosely correlated
-8.20%
PAR - GRND
38%
Loosely correlated
-19.47%
AFRM - GRND
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.40%
BTDR - GRND
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
More