Advertisement
AFRM vs GRND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Buy and GRND is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GRND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRND’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GRND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а +9.95% price change this week, while GRND (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
GRND is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.56% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.74% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| AFRM | GRND | AFRM / GRND | |
| Capitalization | 27.8B | 2.9B | 958% |
| EBITDA | 587M | -6.94M | -8,457% |
| Gain YTD | 40.082 | -15.303 | -262% |
| P/E Ratio | 568.73 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.01B | 385M | 781% |
| Total Cash | 2.13B | 121M | 1,761% |
| Total Debt | 7.36B | 288M | 2,555% |
| AFRM | GRND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 39% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRBLX | 64.83 | 0.35 | +0.54% |
| Parnassus Core Equity Investor | |||
| GSCIX | 43.95 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| abrdn US Small Cap Equity Inst | |||
| GGQPX | 23.24 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P | |||
| JVTCX | 67.88 | -0.20 | -0.29% |
| Janus Henderson Venture C | |||
| JSVSX | 15.94 | -0.08 | -0.50% |
| Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value S | |||
AFRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | 100% | +3.76% | ||
| SHOP - AFRM | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| NET - AFRM | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| HUBS - AFRM | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| XYZ - AFRM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| ALIT - AFRM | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
GRND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRND has been loosely correlated with ACON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRND jumps, then ACON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRND | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| ACON - GRND | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| MDB - GRND | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| PAR - GRND | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AFRM - GRND | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| BTDR - GRND | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.88% | ||
More | ||||