AFRM
Price
$73.03
Change
+$0.42 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:08 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.97B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FOUR
Price
$67.52
Change
+$0.40 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.62B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs FOUR

Header iconAFRM vs FOUR Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs FOURBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$73.03
Change+$0.42 (+0.58%)
Volume$8.97K
Capitalization23.97B
Shift4 Payments
Price$67.52
Change+$0.40 (+0.60%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization4.62B
AFRM vs FOUR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. FOUR commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and FOUR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $72.61 vs. FOUR: $67.11)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and FOUR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 159% vs. FOUR: 129%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $23.97B vs. FOUR: $4.62B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $23.97B. FOUR’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.41T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOUR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOUR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOUR is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FOUR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FOUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOUR is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -12.57% price change this week, while FOUR (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

FOUR is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($24B) has a higher market cap than FOUR($4.62B). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than FOUR: AFRM (105.23) vs FOUR (31.36). FOUR YTD gains are higher at: 6.575 vs. AFRM (-2.445). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 918M vs. FOUR (790M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. FOUR (1.51B). FOUR has less debt than AFRM: FOUR (4.79B) vs AFRM (7.96B). FOUR has higher revenues than AFRM: FOUR (3.88B) vs AFRM (3.46B).
AFRMFOURAFRM / FOUR
Capitalization24B4.62B520%
EBITDA918M790M116%
Gain YTD-2.4456.575-37%
P/E Ratio105.2331.36336%
Revenue3.46B3.88B89%
Total Cash2.24B1.51B148%
Total Debt7.96B4.79B166%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMFOUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FOUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBH192.290.39
+0.21%
VanEck Biotech ETF
RAYE29.00N/A
N/A
Rayliant Quantamental Emerging Market ex-China Equity ETF
VIXI12.10N/A
N/A
Defiance Enhanced Long Vol ETF
FAS162.00-0.60
-0.37%
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
QCLR28.56-0.20
-0.71%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-4.42%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+6.29%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+3.34%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
HOOD - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

FOUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOUR has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOUR jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOUR
1D Price
Change %
FOUR100%
+2.44%
CPAY - FOUR
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
TOST - FOUR
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
COIN - FOUR
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
RIOT - FOUR
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.34%
AFRM - FOUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
More