Advertisement
AFRM vs COMP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and COMP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCOMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COMP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- COMP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -10.36% price change this week, while COMP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -7.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.72%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
COMP is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-2.96% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Real Estate Development (-1.75% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| AFRM | COMP | AFRM / COMP | |
| Capitalization | 20.4B | 8.82B | 231% |
| EBITDA | 918M | 49.1M | 1,870% |
| Gain YTD | -17.157 | 15.232 | -113% |
| P/E Ratio | 89.36 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.46B | 6.64B | 52% |
| Total Cash | 2.24B | 170M | 1,318% |
| Total Debt | 7.96B | 481M | 1,654% |
| AFRM | COMP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
Advertisement
AFRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| COIN - AFRM | 81% Closely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| CLSK - AFRM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| RIOT - AFRM | 70% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| SOFI - AFRM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| OMF - AFRM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||
COMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMP | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| COIN - COMP | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| AFRM - COMP | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| U - COMP | 59% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
| CLSK - COMP | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| TDOC - COMP | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
More | ||||