Advertisement
AFRM vs CLSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -4.90% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -24.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-1.67% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.66% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| AFRM | CLSK | AFRM / CLSK | |
| Capitalization | 20.5B | 2.61B | 784% |
| EBITDA | 918M | 763M | 120% |
| Gain YTD | -16.485 | 0.988 | -1,668% |
| P/E Ratio | 90.09 | 9.13 | 987% |
| Revenue | 3.46B | 766M | 452% |
| Total Cash | 2.24B | 1.01B | 222% |
| Total Debt | 7.96B | 824M | 966% |
CLSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 16 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AFRM | CLSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTCSX | 31.45 | 0.32 | +1.03% |
| Glenmede Small Cap Equity Adv | |||
| TIBRX | 35.63 | 0.23 | +0.65% |
| Thornburg Investment Income Builder R3 | |||
| PJDQX | 19.50 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend R6 | |||
| FCGBX | 3.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Templeton Global Dynamic Income C | |||
| JOHIX | 30.06 | N/A | N/A |
| JOHCM International Select Institutional | |||
AFRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFRM | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| COIN - AFRM | 81% Closely correlated | -6.14% | ||
| CLSK - AFRM | 71% Closely correlated | -10.04% | ||
| RIOT - AFRM | 70% Closely correlated | -7.82% | ||
| SOFI - AFRM | 68% Closely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| OMF - AFRM | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | -10.04% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 82% Closely correlated | -8.51% | ||
| BITF - CLSK | 76% Closely correlated | -11.74% | ||
| BTBT - CLSK | 76% Closely correlated | -8.29% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 76% Closely correlated | -7.82% | ||
| HIVE - CLSK | 75% Closely correlated | -7.10% | ||
More | ||||