AFRM
Price
$72.92
Change
-$0.26 (-0.36%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
23.75B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
BTDR
Price
$25.24
Change
+$5.12 (+25.45%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.3B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs BTDR

Header iconAFRM vs BTDR Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs BTDRBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$72.92
Change-$0.26 (-0.36%)
Volume$3.55M
Capitalization23.75B
Bitdeer Technologies Group
Price$25.24
Change+$5.12 (+25.45%)
Volume$25.06K
Capitalization4.3B
AFRM vs BTDR Comparison Chart in %
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. BTDR commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and BTDR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $72.92 vs. BTDR: $20.12)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and BTDR are both not notable
AFRM represents the Computer Communications, while BTDR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 44% vs. BTDR: 132%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $23.75B vs. BTDR: $4.3B
AFRM [@Computer Communications] is valued at $23.75B. BTDR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $312.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBTDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BTDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDR is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTDR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • BTDR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDR is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Computer Communications) experienced а -4.87% price change this week, while BTDR (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +205.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

BTDR is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.91% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($23.7B) has a higher market cap than BTDR($4.3B). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 19.737 vs. BTDR (-7.153). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 712M vs. BTDR (-694.09M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. BTDR (474M). BTDR has less debt than AFRM: BTDR (626M) vs AFRM (7.85B). AFRM has higher revenues than BTDR: AFRM (3.22B) vs BTDR (357M).
AFRMBTDRAFRM / BTDR
Capitalization23.7B4.3B551%
EBITDA712M-694.09M-103%
Gain YTD19.737-7.153-276%
P/E Ratio486.13N/A-
Revenue3.22B357M903%
Total Cash2.23B474M470%
Total Debt7.85B626M1,254%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMBTDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBACX31.680.14
+0.44%
NYLI Balanced Class C
FFMMX62.280.19
+0.31%
American Funds American Mutual 529-F-2
MDEFX22.270.06
+0.27%
BlackRock International Select Eq Inv A
LZIOX20.37N/A
N/A
Lazard International Equity Open
FLCKX46.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock K

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-0.36%
SHOP - AFRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
NET - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
HUBS - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
XYZ - AFRM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
ALIT - AFRM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More

BTDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDR has been loosely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTDR jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDR
1D Price
Change %
BTDR100%
-1.61%
MSTR - BTDR
56%
Loosely correlated
-4.69%
CORZ - BTDR
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
SOUN - BTDR
47%
Loosely correlated
+8.99%
AFRM - BTDR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
XYZ - BTDR
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More