AFNL
Price
$171.92
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MSVB
Price
$16.32
Change
+$0.08 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFNL vs MSVB

Header iconAFNL vs MSVB Comparison
Open Charts AFNL vs MSVBBanner chart's image
Amfin Financial
Price$171.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
Mid-Southern Ban
Price$16.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
Volume$200
Capitalization32.17M
AFNL vs MSVB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFNL vs. MSVB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNL is a Hold and MSVB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AFNL: $171.92 vs. MSVB: $16.32)
Brand notoriety: AFNL and MSVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFNL: 4% vs. MSVB: 5%
Market capitalization -- AFNL: $0 vs. MSVB: $32.17M
AFNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MSVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $32.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSVB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSVB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSVB is a better buy in the long-term than AFNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSVB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MSVB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFNL and MSVB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.01% price change this week, while MSVB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSVB YTD gains are higher at: 9.102 vs. AFNL (-7.070).
AFNLMSVBAFNL / MSVB
CapitalizationN/A32.2M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.0709.102-78%
P/E RatioN/A18.59-
RevenueN/A8.88M-
Total CashN/A1.25M-
Total DebtN/A28.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFNL vs MSVB: Fundamental Ratings
AFNL
MSVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
10081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFNL's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSVB (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AFNL’s stock grew significantly faster than MSVB’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFNL (100) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's SMR Rating (81) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AFNL (100) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AFNL (81) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFNL (100) in the null industry. This means that MSVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFNLMSVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSVB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIBS2.850.10
+3.64%
1stdibs.com
APG34.330.76
+2.26%
APi Group Corporation
JMIA4.430.02
+0.45%
Jumia Technologies AG
BOH71.130.23
+0.32%
Bank of Hawaii Corp
MSGM2.97-0.01
-0.34%
Motorsport Games

AFNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFNL has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFNL jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFNL
1D Price
Change %
AFNL100%
N/A
OTPBF - AFNL
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - AFNL
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
MLGF - AFNL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
WOBK - AFNL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - AFNL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSVB has been closely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSVB jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSVB
1D Price
Change %
MSVB100%
+0.49%
OTPBF - MSVB
89%
Closely correlated
N/A
WOBK - MSVB
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MFDB - MSVB
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTFI - MSVB
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - MSVB
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More