AFNL
Price
$171.92
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MLGF
Price
$20.96
Change
-$0.38 (-1.78%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
41.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFNL vs MLGF

Header iconAFNL vs MLGF Comparison
Open Charts AFNL vs MLGFBanner chart's image
Amfin Financial
Price$171.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
Malaga Financial
Price$20.96
Change-$0.38 (-1.78%)
Volume$450
Capitalization41.82M
AFNL vs MLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFNL vs. MLGF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNL is a Hold and MLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AFNL: $171.92 vs. MLGF: $20.97)
Brand notoriety: AFNL and MLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFNL: 4% vs. MLGF: 18%
Market capitalization -- AFNL: $0 vs. MLGF: $41.82M
AFNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MLGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $41.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the long-term than AFNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MLGF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGF is a better buy in the short-term than AFNL.

Price Growth

AFNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGF YTD gains are higher at: -4.078 vs. AFNL (-7.070).
AFNLMLGFAFNL / MLGF
CapitalizationN/A41.8M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.070-4.078173%
P/E RatioN/A7.61-
RevenueN/A18M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A263M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFNL vs MLGF: Fundamental Ratings
AFNL
MLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFNL's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGF (37). This means that AFNL’s stock grew similarly to MLGF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that MLGF’s stock grew significantly faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that MLGF’s stock grew significantly faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as AFNL (62). This means that MLGF’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MLGF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that MLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFNLMLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
12%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOSSY10.010.21
+2.14%
Hugo Boss AG
ASHTY278.952.15
+0.78%
Ashtead Group PLC
CFNCF146.65N/A
N/A
Cie Financiere Tradition Lausanne ACT
CMPD3.70N/A
N/A
CompuMed, Inc.
AUVGF0.07N/A
N/A
Australian Vintage Ltd.

AFNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFNL has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFNL jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFNL
1D Price
Change %
AFNL100%
N/A
OTPBF - AFNL
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - AFNL
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLGF - AFNL
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
WOBK - AFNL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - AFNL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLGF and AFNL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLGF and AFNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGF
1D Price
Change %
MLGF100%
-1.80%
AFNL - MLGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSBC - MLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
RBB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
TFSL - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
RBKB - MLGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More