AFNL
Price
$171.92
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MCBK
Price
$25.46
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
64.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFNL vs MCBK

Header iconAFNL vs MCBK Comparison
Open Charts AFNL vs MCBKBanner chart's image
Amfin Financial
Price$171.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
Madison County Financial
Price$25.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$225
Capitalization64.97M
AFNL vs MCBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFNL vs. MCBK commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNL is a Hold and MCBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AFNL: $171.92 vs. MCBK: $25.46)
Brand notoriety: AFNL and MCBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFNL: 4% vs. MCBK: 9%
Market capitalization -- AFNL: $0 vs. MCBK: $64.97M
AFNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MCBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $64.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBK is a better buy in the long-term than AFNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFNL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFNL and MCBK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.01% price change this week, while MCBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBK YTD gains are higher at: 3.272 vs. AFNL (-7.070).
AFNLMCBKAFNL / MCBK
CapitalizationN/A65M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.0703.272-216%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A15M-
Total CashN/A5.73M-
Total DebtN/A51.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFNL vs MCBK: Fundamental Ratings
AFNL
MCBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
1007
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFNL's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MCBK (35). This means that AFNL’s stock grew similarly to MCBK’s over the last 12 months.

MCBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as AFNL (100). This means that MCBK’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MCBK's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that MCBK’s stock grew significantly faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MCBK's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as AFNL (81). This means that MCBK’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

MCBK's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as AFNL (100). This means that MCBK’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFNLMCBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIBS2.850.10
+3.64%
1stdibs.com
APG34.330.76
+2.26%
APi Group Corporation
JMIA4.430.02
+0.45%
Jumia Technologies AG
BOH71.130.23
+0.32%
Bank of Hawaii Corp
MSGM2.97-0.01
-0.34%
Motorsport Games

AFNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFNL has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFNL jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFNL
1D Price
Change %
AFNL100%
N/A
OTPBF - AFNL
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - AFNL
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
MLGF - AFNL
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
WOBK - AFNL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - AFNL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCBK and OTPBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCBK and OTPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBK
1D Price
Change %
MCBK100%
N/A
OTPBF - MCBK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSVB - MCBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BKPKF - MCBK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFNL - MCBK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOBK - MCBK
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More