Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$25.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. AFNIX (1.86B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.87) vs RWMFX (1.48). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFNIX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AFNIX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. AFNIX (5.89). AFNIX (58.80) and RWMFX (56.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.405 | 5.739 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.89 | 7.88 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.22 | 32.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.80 | 56.79 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.25 | 71.15 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement