Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$24.70
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.56
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. AFNIX (1.73B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.81) vs RWMFX (1.47). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (14 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFNIX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNIX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. AFNIX (1.58). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.26 vs. AFNIX (29.55).
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.982 | 2.287 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.47 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.58 | 10.48 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.52 | 31.91 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.55 | 39.26 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.45 | 102.67 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement