Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$26.33
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. AFNIX (1.87B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.87) vs RWMFX (1.48). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFNIX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNIX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. AFNIX (7.35). AFNIX (55.69) and RWMFX (54.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.031 | 7.001 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 9.60 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.88 | 32.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.69 | 54.74 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.08 | 72.42 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement