Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$24.40
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.88
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. AFNIX (1.72B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.74) vs RWMFX (1.38). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFNIX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNIX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. AFNIX (-1.57). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.34 vs. AFNIX (30.69).
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.266 | 8.297 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.38 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.57 | 6.45 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.99 | 33.08 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.69 | 42.34 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.24 | 82.48 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement